Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241034›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

YouTube as a source of education on piriformis injection: a content, quality, and reliability analysis.

Yucel Olgun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yucel OlgunAgri Training and Research Hospital, Agri, Turkey. dryucelolgun@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPiriformis injection is commonly used to diagnose and relieve piriformis syndrome.YouTube has become a frequently accessed platform for healthcare professionals seeking procedural information.However, the lack of studies on the quality and reliability of medical content on YouTube raises major concerns, suggesting that the platform cannot be trusted as a source of medical information, particularly in terms of reliability and content quality.This study aims to assess the educational value and quality of YouTube videos on piriformis injections and is the first to specifically evaluate these aspects.

methodsA keyword search for "piriformis injection" was conducted on YouTube in December 2024, ensuring search history was cleared before the review.The top 100 videos were screened, and data including subscriber count, views, likes, dislikes, comments, video duration, upload date, like ratio, view ratio, video power index, injection guidance method, and video source were collected. Two pain medicine specialists independently evaluated the videos using the modified DISCERN, JAMA benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Scale (GQS) to assess reliability and quality.

resultsOf the 100 screened videos, 24 met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Notably, none of the videos attained maximum scores across all three evaluation criteria. According to the modified DISCERN score, 58% of the videos had low reliability, while 50% had low quality according to the GQS score. Video scores were consistent across different sources. Positive correlations were observed between the number of views, likes, dislikes, and comments. Additionally, strong correlations were identified between GQS, DISCERN, and JAMA scores.

conclusionThe educational value of YouTube videos cannot be evaluated based on a single factor, such as the source of the video or its popularity metrics. Relying on YouTube as the sole source can likely lead to misinformation, so cross-verifying the information in these videos is vital. While YouTube can be a supplementary resource, it should not replace primary educational materials. Therefore, healthcare professionals and organizations should be encouraged to produce high-quality, peer-reviewed educational content to ensure the quality of information available on such platforms.

Indexed as

Social MediaVideo RecordingHumansInjectionsReproducibility of ResultsOnline medical educationPiriformis injectionQualityYouTube

Identifiers

PMID40241034
PMCPMC12004847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.