ArticleBMC medical education2025
YouTube as a source of education on piriformis injection: a content, quality, and reliability analysis.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The quality and reliability evaluation of Parkinson's disease-related short videos on social short video platforms: cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- YouTube as a resource for Parkinson's disease exercise education: an evaluation of video quality and reliability.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPiriformis injection is commonly used to diagnose and relieve piriformis syndrome.YouTube has become a frequently accessed platform for healthcare professionals seeking procedural information.However, the lack of studies on the quality and reliability of medical content on YouTube raises major concerns, suggesting that the platform cannot be trusted as a source of medical information, particularly in terms of reliability and content quality.This study aims to assess the educational value and quality of YouTube videos on piriformis injections and is the first to specifically evaluate these aspects.
methodsA keyword search for "piriformis injection" was conducted on YouTube in December 2024, ensuring search history was cleared before the review.The top 100 videos were screened, and data including subscriber count, views, likes, dislikes, comments, video duration, upload date, like ratio, view ratio, video power index, injection guidance method, and video source were collected. Two pain medicine specialists independently evaluated the videos using the modified DISCERN, JAMA benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Scale (GQS) to assess reliability and quality.
resultsOf the 100 screened videos, 24 met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Notably, none of the videos attained maximum scores across all three evaluation criteria. According to the modified DISCERN score, 58% of the videos had low reliability, while 50% had low quality according to the GQS score. Video scores were consistent across different sources. Positive correlations were observed between the number of views, likes, dislikes, and comments. Additionally, strong correlations were identified between GQS, DISCERN, and JAMA scores.
conclusionThe educational value of YouTube videos cannot be evaluated based on a single factor, such as the source of the video or its popularity metrics. Relying on YouTube as the sole source can likely lead to misinformation, so cross-verifying the information in these videos is vital. While YouTube can be a supplementary resource, it should not replace primary educational materials. Therefore, healthcare professionals and organizations should be encouraged to produce high-quality, peer-reviewed educational content to ensure the quality of information available on such platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.