Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241032›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

Automated opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using deep learning-based automatic segmentation and radiomics on proximal femur images from low-dose abdominal CT.

Changyu Du, Jian He, Qiye Cheng, Mengting Hu, Jingyi Zhang, Jiageng Shen, Shigeng Wang, Yijun Liu, Jianying Li, Wei Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Changyu Du *Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Xigang District, Lianhe Road, No.193, Dalian, China.
Jian He *Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Xigang District, Lianhe Road, No.193, Dalian, China.
Qiye ChengDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Xigang District, Lianhe Road, No.193, Dalian, China.
Mengting HuDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Xigang District, Lianhe Road, No.193, Dalian, China.
Jingyi ZhangDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Xigang District, Lianhe Road, No.193, Dalian, China.
Jiageng ShenDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Xigang District, Lianhe Road, No.193, Dalian, China.
Shigeng WangDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Xigang District, Lianhe Road, No.193, Dalian, China.
Yijun LiuDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Xigang District, Lianhe Road, No.193, Dalian, China.
Jianying LiCT Research, GE Healthcare, Dalian, China.
Wei WeiDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Xigang District, Lianhe Road, No.193, Dalian, China. weiweidy1988@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE AND

objectivesTo establish an automated osteoporosis detection model based on low-dose abdominal CT (LDCT). This model combined a deep learning-based automatic segmentation of the proximal femur with a radiomics-based bone status classification. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 456 participants were retrospectively included and were divided into a development cohort comprising 355 patients, with a 7:3 ratio randomly assigned to the training and validation cohorts, and a test cohort comprising 101 patients. The automatic segmentation model for the proximal femur was trained using VB-Net. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and volume difference (VD) were employed to evaluate the performance of the segmentation model. A three-classification predictive model for assessing bone mineral status was constructed utilizing radiomic analysis. The diagnostic performance of the radiomics model was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.

resultsThe automatic segmentation model for the proximal femur demonstrated excellent performance, achieving DSC values of 0.975 ± 0.012 and 0.955 ± 0.137 in the validation and test cohorts, respectively. In the test cohort, the radiomics model utilizing the random forest (RF) classifier achieved AUC values, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.924 (95% CI: 0.854-0.967), 0.846 (95% CI: 0.719-0.931), and 0.837 (95% CI: 0.703-0.927) for the identification of normal bone mass. For the identification of osteoporosis, the corresponding metrics were 0.960 (95% CI: 0.913-1.000), 0.947 (95% CI: 0.740-0.999), and 0.963 (95% CI: 0.897-0.992). In the case of osteopenia, the corresponding metrics were 0.828 (95% CI: 0.747-0.909), 0.767 (95% CI: 0.577-0.901), and 0.746 (95% CI: 0.629-0.842).

conclusionA three-classification predictive model combining a deep learning-based automatic segmentation of the proximal femur and a radiomics-based bone status classification on LDCT images can be used for the opportunistic detection of osteoporosis.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFemurMass ScreeningOsteoporosisTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAged, 80 and overBone DensityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiation DosageRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesAutomatic detectionBone mineral densityDeep learningOpportunistic screeningOsteoporosisRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID40241032
PMCPMC12004748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.