Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241030›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2025

Co-developing a digital mindfulness- and acceptance-based intervention for endometriosis management and care: a qualitative feasibility study.

Nina Maindal, Ulrik Bak Kirk, Karina Ejgaard Hansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nina MaindalDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark.
Ulrik Bak KirkDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark. ubk@ph.au.dk.
Karina Ejgaard HansenDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark.

Funding

H2020 Health 101017562
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMY-ENDO (Mind Your ENDOmetriosis) is a mindfulness- and acceptance-based endometriosis self-management intervention aimed at teaching women with symptomatic endometriosis how to manage and reduce negative physical, psychological, and social consequences of endometriosis. This study aimed at involving women with endometriosis in the co-development process of a digital version of MY-ENDO to investigate their experiences with and attitudes toward the intervention.

methodsThe study was designed as a qualitative feasibility study. The empirical material consisted of 35 interviews with seven women who self-reported a diagnosis with endometriosis, based on a semi-structured interview guide. Each participant completed the first four sessions of the intervention and was interviewed before the first and after each of the four sessions (five times in total) during participation. The study was based on a phenomenological approach and the data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis strategy.

resultsAnalysis indicated that the two parts of the program called 'knowledge of the disease' and 'management of the disease' with eight related subthemes were crucial for participants' outcomes. In addition, a generic theme called 'motivation and alliance' was identified.

conclusionThe digital self-management intervention MY-ENDO was generally experienced and evaluated as positive. It was considered an advantage that the program was specifically tailored to and targeting endometriosis as well as developed in collaboration with patients. Having a contact person was deemed important with regard to maintenance and motivation suggesting potential consequences for the implementation of this digital solution in clinical practice.

Indexed as

EndometriosisMindfulnessSelf-ManagementAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchDigital mental healthEndometriosisMindfulness-based interventionPatient co-developmentQualitative feasibility studySelf-management intervention

Identifiers

PMID40241030
PMCPMC12001608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.