ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025
Combining machine learning and dynamic system techniques to early detection of respiratory outbreaks in routinely collected primary healthcare records.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation of AESOP early-warning system for respiratory disease: a pilot and validation study using routinely collected data in Amazonas, Brazil.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Syndromic surveillance systems to detect outbreaks of gastroenteritis in high-income countries: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Advocating the potential of artificial intelligence for syndrome discovery in syndromic surveillance systems: A scoping review.iScience · 2026Review
- Machine Learning in Primary Health Care: The Research Landscape.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMethods that enable early outbreak detection represent powerful tools in epidemiological surveillance, allowing adequate planning and timely response to disease surges. Syndromic surveillance data collected from primary healthcare encounters can be used as a proxy for the incidence of confirmed cases of respiratory diseases. Deviations from historical trends in encounter numbers can provide valuable insights into emerging diseases with the potential to trigger widespread outbreaks.
methodsUnsupervised machine learning methods and dynamical systems concepts were combined into the Mixed Model of Artificial Intelligence and Next-Generation (MMAING) ensemble, which aims to detect early signs of outbreaks based on primary healthcare encounters. We used data from 27 Brazilian health regions, which cover 41% of the country's territory, from 2017-2023 to identify anomalous increases in primary healthcare encounters that could be associated with an epidemic onset. Our validation approach comprised (i) a comparative analysis across Brazilian capitals; (ii) an analysis of warning signs for the COVID-19 period; and (iii) a comparison with related surveillance methods (namely EARS C1, C2, C3) based on real and synthetic labeled data.
resultsThe MMAING ensemble demonstrated its effectiveness in early outbreak detection using both actual and synthetic data, outperforming other surveillance methods. It successfully detected early warning signals in synthetic data, achieving a probability of detection of 86%, a positive predictive value of 85%, and an average reliability of 79%. When compared to EARS C1, C2, and C3, it exhibited superior performance based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve results on synthetic data. When evaluated on real-world data, MMAING performed on par with EARS C2. Notably, the MMAING ensemble accurately predicted the onset of the four waves of the COVID-19 period in Brazil, further validating its effectiveness in real-world scenarios.
conclusionIdentifying trends in time series data related to primary healthcare encounters indicated the possibility of developing a reliable method for the early detection of outbreaks. MMAING demonstrated consistent identification capabilities across various scenarios, outperforming established reference methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.