Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40240993›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Comparative efficacy of tislelizumab plus lenvatinib and tislelizumab alone against advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after lenvatinib failure: a real-world study.

Jiajin Yang, Qiuping Xu, Sihao Luo, Jianbing Wu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Chinese expert consensus on the use of standardized second-line drugs for primary hepatocellular carcinoma].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiajin YangDepartment of Oncology, Fengcheng People's Hospital, Fengcheng, 331100, Jiangxi Province, China.
Qiuping XuDepartment of Oncology, Fengcheng People's Hospital, Fengcheng, 331100, Jiangxi Province, China.
Sihao LuoDepartment of Oncology, Fengcheng People's Hospital, Fengcheng, 331100, Jiangxi Province, China.
Jianbing WuDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 1 Minde Road, Donghu District, Nanchang City, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China. hhgwjb@163.com.

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 82060435the Science and Technology Department of Yichun City, Jiangxi Province No. 2022DJH6446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of tislelizumab plus lenvatinib (TL group) and tislelizumab monotherapy (T group) in patients with stage C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system after lenvatinib failure, and it analyzed the factors influencing the effectiveness of TL as a second-line treatment. This retrospective analysis involved 51 patients treated at a single center between January 2019 and July 2023. Survival outcomes and tumor responses were compared between the TL and T monotherapy groups. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were identified using Cox proportional hazard regression models. Among patients with BCLC stage C advanced HCC who experienced lenvatinib treatment failure, median PFS was significantly longer in the TL group than in the T group (6.8 months vs. 4.5 months, p = 0.003), and OS was notably extended in the TL group (14.0 months vs. 10.4 months, p = 0.012). Although the disease control rate (64% vs. 53.8%, p = 0.461) and objective response rate (20% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.202) were numerically higher in the TL group, these differences did not reach significance. Child-Pugh B liver function and tislelizumab monotherapy were independent prognostic factors for poor OS, whereas only tislelizumab monotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for poor PFS, Child-Pugh B was not a prognostic factor for PFS. Subgroup analysis demonstrated the OS benefit of tislelizumab plus lenvatinib in patients with Child-Pugh A liver function (14.0 months vs. 12.0 months, p = 0.013) but not in those with Child-Pugh B liver function (7.7 months vs. 6.1 months, p = 0.225). In the TL group, the most frequent treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were hand-foot skin reaction (32%), hypertension (28%), diarrhea (32%), and hypothyroidism (20%). Grade 3 or higher AEs occurred in 24% of patients in the TL group, and hand-foot skin reaction and diarrhea were the most frequent grade 3 or higher AEs. The incidence of AEs was comparable between the two groups. As a second-line treatment, the combination of tislelizumab and lenvatinib was well tolerated and associated with improved OS and PFS versus tislelizumab alone for patients with advanced HCC, particularly in those with Child-Pugh A liver function.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsPhenylurea CompoundsQuinolinesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment FailureAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedlenvatinibPhenylurea CompoundsQuinolinestislelizumabHepatocellular carcinomaLenvatinibOverall survivalSecond-line therapyTislelizumab

Identifiers

PMID40240993
PMCPMC12004550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.