Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40240977›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025

Endo-loop or interrupted suture closure of gallbladder remnant during laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy- a retrospective analysis of our experience at a high-volume centre of Eastern Nepal.

Abhijeet Kumar, Bhawani Khanal Designation, Bikash Kumar Sah, Parbat Raj Regmi, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Suresh Prasad Sah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abhijeet KumarDepartment of Surgery, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal. abhijeetkr639@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5355-6278
Bhawani Khanal DesignationDepartment of Surgery, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
Bikash Kumar SahDepartment of Surgery, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
Parbat Raj RegmiDepartment of Surgery, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
Rakesh Kumar GuptaDepartment of Surgery, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
Suresh Prasad SahDepartment of Surgery, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSubtotal laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LSC) is a rescue procedure in difficult case, retaining all advantages of minimally invasive surgery. The most reputed definition of subtotal cholecystectomy is the removal of 3/4th of gallbladder with closure of the infundibulum. The closure of the infundibulum can be with either intracorporeal interrupted suture or pre-knotted endo-loop. This study aims to share our experience with the stump closure techniques (either interrupted suture closure or endo-loop closure) during LSC so that the result of the study helps surgeons to choose an appropriate technique of the stump closure.

methodsThis study includes patients with indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy but who underwent LSC (Henneman's type C) because of intraoperative findings over last 5-years(2019-2024AD) in BPKIHS, a high-volume centre of the eastern Nepal.

resultsOver last 5-years period, a total of 4578 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed, 120(2.6%) of which were subtotal. The patients who underwent LSC had male predominance with male/female ratio of 1.3:1 with mean age of 55.53 ± 7.45years (37-71 years). The most common pre-operative diagnosis in these patients who underwent LSC was uncomplicated gall bladder stone in 55(45.5%) patients and intraoperative finding was the frozen Calot in 50(41.7%) patients. Operative time (126.76 ± 26.85 versus 158.65 ± 17.15 min), intraoperative blood loss (210.29 ± 30.56 versus 246.15 ± 28.29 ml), minor stump leak rate (0/68 versus 20/52), length of hospital stay (2.78 ± 0.83 versus 3.58 ± 1.35days) and duration of the drain (5.97 ± 2.75 versus 9 ± 3.55 days) were significantly lower in the stump closure with endo-loop group in comparison to the stump closure with interrupted suture group with p-value < 0.05.

conclusionNowadays, LSC is gaining preference over conversion to open procedure in difficult cholecystectomy cases. It is better to close the remnant stump of gallbladder with endo-loop to decrease biliary leak with addition advantage of shorter operative time, lesser intraoperative blood loss, shorter length of hospital stays and shorter duration of the drain placement. We recommend to close the remnant stump with endo-loop if the remnant stump is mobilized all around with intact and adequate length of all sides (including posterior one). However, the stump closure with interrupted suture should be opted if above mentioned criteria are not achieved.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicGallbladderSuture TechniquesAdultAgedFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNepalOperative TimeRetrospective StudiesLaparoscopic cholecystectomyLaparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomyStump leak

Identifiers

PMID40240977
PMCPMC12001590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.