ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Exploring midwifery role and scope in acute early pregnancy care: a survey of midwives and midwifery students in Australia.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Australian MotherSafe enhanced service for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy and hyperemesis gravidarum: a mixed methods study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe scope of practice of the contemporary midwife encompasses a range of sexual and reproductive healthcare, including care throughout pregnancy. Midwives are experts in pregnancy care, but many do not provide care for women with unexpected (acute) complications in early pregnancy (< 20 weeks) in Australia. Women experiencing acute pregnancy complications < 20 weeks usually attend an emergency department rather than a maternity unit. These settings do not typically employ midwives and may not meet women's need for timely and informed physical care and psychosocial support. A gap in evidence exists in relation to the role and scope of practice of the midwife in acute early pregnancy care provision in Australia.
methodsMidwives and midwifery students in Australia were purposively sampled and invited to complete an online cross-sectional survey exploring midwifery practice in acute early pregnancy care. Data were collected from July 1st to September 30th, 2024. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Free-text responses were analysed using inductive content analysis.
resultsResponses from 294 midwives and 46 midwifery students (n = 340) were analysed. Participants recognised that midwives should provide acute care in early pregnancy, and many had knowledge, confidence or experience in this area. The most reported setting for acute early pregnancy care provision was the general emergency department; early pregnancy assessment service models were also common. Some settings prioritised the employment of registered nurses over midwives in acute early pregnancy services. Challenges to midwives providing acute early pregnancy care included inadequate clinical exposure as qualified midwives, and women being placed in non-maternity settings.
conclusionParticipants supported midwives providing acute care in early pregnancy, confirming that midwives' professional scope should not be impacted by pregnancy gestation or outcome. However, current midwifery education programs may not be adequately preparing midwives to provide comprehensive care for women with acute early pregnancy complications. Those midwives who are providing care may not be fulfilling professional scope. Findings have utility in supporting policy, education and service review, and highlight further gaps in evidence for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.