ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Patient Portals and Shared Decision-Making in US Adults With or at Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examining the Intersections Between Medical Mistrust, Discrimination, and Shared Decision-Making Among Racially Diverse Women in the US: Insights From the 2024 Health Information National Trends Survey.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- The global burden of hypertension and its epidemiological impacts on adolescents and young adults: projections to 2050.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient portals are secure online platforms that have shown potential to facilitate shared decision-making (SDM) in cardiovascular disease risk reduction. However, the role of health care providers (HCPs) in offering patient portals within the context of SDM remains poorly understood. This study aimed to examine the relationship between patient portal access offered by HCPs and patient engagement in SDM among adults with or at risk of cardiovascular disease in the United States (US).
methodsThis population-based cross-sectional study included a nationally representative sample of US adults from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey. We performed weighted multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine the association between patient portal access offered by HCPs and patient engagement in SDM.
resultsThe study included a representative sample of 4234 adults with or at risk of cardiovascular disease. The mean age of the participants was 48.5 years (SD, 17.1), with 50.6% female and 62.8% White. Adults who were offered access to patient portals by HCPs (adjusted odds ratio, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.34-3.32]) and encouraged to use them (adjusted odds ratio, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.15-2.45]) were more likely to engage in SDM than their counterparts, adjusting for covariates. The extent of this association varied by demographics and social determinants of health.
conclusionsOffering access to patient portals and encouragement to use them by HCPs was associated with high SDM among US adults with or at risk of cardiovascular disease. Future research is needed to explore the possible causal relationship between patient portal use and access and patient engagement in SDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.