ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Burden of Congenital Heart Anomalies in North Africa and the Middle East, 1990 to 2021: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Spectrum of Congenital Heart Diseases in Iraqi Patients.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2026Article
- Global burden of developmental intellectual disability in children and adolescents with congenital heart disease, 1990-2021: a population-based study.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Sex differences in global burden of Congenital Heart Anomalies in children under five from 1990 to 2021.PloS one · 2026Article
- Hybrid approach: a prospective option for treating congenital heart defects in pediatric patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Trends and predictors of mortality among children and adolescents with congenital heart disease in Ethiopia: A retrospective follow-up study.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCongenital heart anomalies (CHAs) remain a significant global health burden despite advances in diagnosis and management. Data on CHA burden in North Africa and the Middle East region are scarce. This study aimed to estimate CHA trends from 1990 to 2021. METHODS AND
resultsUsing the Global Burden of Disease Research 2021 database, we assessed CHA incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), stratified by age, sex, and sociodemographic index (SDI) at regional and national levels. Decomposition analysis was used to evaluate the impact of population growth on CHA incidence. In 2021, CHAs caused 35 272 deaths (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 28 067-43 670) and 3 181 543 DALYs (95% UI, 2 544 864-3 899 408) in the North Africa and the Middle East region. Incidence and prevalence increased by 13% (95% CI, 10-17) and 70% (95% CI, 67-74), respectively, whereas CHA-related deaths and DALYs declined by 63% (95% CI, 28-73). Infants <12 months of age accounted for 74.9% of deaths and DALYs, with half occurring within the first month. High-SDI countries had the lowest CHA-related DALYs, whereas middle-SDI countries showed the most substantial decline in mortality. Decomposition analysis highlighted that the actual CHA incidence is lower than expected despite population growth.
conclusionsAlthough CHA incidence and prevalence increased, mortality and DALYs decreased, particularly in middle-SDI countries. The highest burden was among infants, with better outcomes in higher-SDI nations. More effective strategies are needed to reduce the preventable childhood deaths related to CHAs in the North Africa and the Middle East region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.