ArticleESC heart failure2025
Right ventricular strain predicts outcome in patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan: A sub-analysis of DISCOVER-ARNI.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strain imaging in heart failure: from early detection to prognostic assessment.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- Role of imaging techniques in monitoring atrial cardiomyopathy and atrial failure: a scientific statement.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- The prognostic value of RV strain in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction on sacubitril/valsartan: a critical appraisal and future directions.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Right ventricular strain predicts outcome in patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan: A sub-analysis of DISCOVER-ARNI.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsAngiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) have emerged as a pivotal medical treatment considerably improving the clinical outcome of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Identifying individuals who stand to benefit the most from ARNI could markedly enhance patient management strategies. The aim of this sub-analysis of DISCOVER-ARNI register was to evaluate the prospective prognostic significance of speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) parameters in patients undergoing ARNI therapy. METHODS AND
resultsDISCOVER-ARNI multicentre Italian register retrospectively enrolled 341 patients with HFrEF referred for treatment with ARNI. These patients underwent clinical, biohumuoral, and echocardiographic assessment at baseline. Subsequently, among those with available right ventricular STE data, a prospective long-term follow-up was conducted by telephone interview or on-site visits. The primary endpoint encompassed a composite of outcomes, including all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, heart failure hospitalization, heart transplantation, and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Overall, 136 HFrEF patients were included in this sub-analysis (mean age 65 ± 10 years, 82% male). The mean follow-up was 40 ± 18 months, during which 32 patients reached the primary endpoint (14 deaths of which 10 due to cardiovascular reasons, 22 hospitalization, 3 heart transplantation, 1 LVAD implantation). Baseline assessment revealed that patients with events had higher LV volumes and EF (LV end-diastolic volume 212 ± 65 vs.174 ± 57 mL, P = 0.002; LV end-systolic volume 156 ± 52 vs. 122 ± 49 mL, P = 0.001; LV EF = 26 ± 5 vs. 29 ± 5 mL, P = 0.006, respectively), lower but preserved tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE, 17 ± 3 vs.19 ± 3, P = 0.008), and higher systolic pulmonary artery pressures (38 ± 11 vs. 31 ± 8 mmHg, P = 0.001) compared to those who did not experience events. LV, left atrial (LA), and free wall right ventricular longitudinal strain (fwRVLS) were reduced in patients with events (-7 ± 2 vs. -8 ± 2%, P = 0.002; 11 ± 3 vs. 15 ± 7%, P = 0.001 and -15 ± 5 vs. -22 ± 5%, P = 0.007, respectively). Employing Cox proportional hazard model including LVEF, TAPSE, RVFAC, LV strain, LA strain, and fwRVLS, the latest emerged as the sole independent predictor of the combined endpoint (hazard ratio = 1.15 [1.05;1.26], P = 0.002). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves determined that fwRVLS = -20% was the optimal cut-off for predicting the combined endpoint (area under curve [AUC] = 0.70). This threshold was used for constructing Kaplan-Meier survival curves, demonstrating effective risk stratification of fwRVLS over long-term follow-up for the primary endpoint.
conclusionsfwRVLS by STE holds promise as a valuable parameter to assess response to ARNI therapy in terms of overall survival, heart failure hospitalizations, heart transplantation, or LVAD implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.