Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40240805›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Deep learning-based multi-criteria recommender system for technology-enhanced learning.

Latifat Salau, Hamada Mohamed, Yunusa Simpa Abdulsalam, Hassan Mohammed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Latifat SalauDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, African University of Science and Technology, Abuja, 900109, Nigeria. ladbdulsalam@aust.edu.ng.
Hamada MohamedSoftware Engineering Lab, University of Aizu, AizuwakamatsuFukushima, 965-8580, Japan.
Yunusa Simpa AbdulsalamCollege of Computing, University Mohammed VI Polytechnic, 43150, Ben Guerir, Morocco.
Hassan MohammedDepartment of Software Engineering, Bayero University, Kano, 700241, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-Criteria Recommender Systems (MCRSs) improve personalization by incorporating multiple user preferences. However, their application in Technology-Enhanced Learning (TEL) remains limited due to challenges such as data sparsity, over-specialization, and cold-start problems. Traditional techniques, such as Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) and SVD +  + , struggle to effectively model the complex interactions within multi-criteria rating data, leading to suboptimal recommendations. This paper introduces a hybrid DeepFM-SVD +  + model, which integrates deep learning and factorization-based techniques to improve multi-criteria recommendations. The model captures both low-order feature interactions using factorization machines and high-order dependencies through deep neural networks, enabling more adaptive recommendations. To evaluate its performance, the model is tested on two multi-criteria datasets: ITM-Rec (TEL domain) and Yahoo Movies (non-TEL domain). The experimental results show that DeepFM-SVD +  + consistently outperforms the traditional techniques across multiple evaluation metrics. The findings highlight significant improvements in accuracy, demonstrating the model's effectiveness in sparse datasets and its generalization across domains. By addressing the limitations of existing MCRS techniques, this study contributes to advancing personalized learning recommendations in TEL and expands the applicability of deep learning-based MCRS beyond educational contexts.

Indexed as

Deep learningMulti-criteria recommender systemsRecommender systemsTechnology-enhanced learning

Identifiers

PMID40240805
PMCPMC12003883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.