Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40240796›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Enhanced aquila optimizer for global optimization and data clustering.

Laith Abualigah, Saleh Ali Alomari, Mohammad H Almomani, Raed Abu Zitar, Hazem Migdady, Kashif Saleem, Aseel Smerat, Vaclav Snasel, Amir H Gandomi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laith AbualigahComputer Science Department, Al al-Bayt University, Mafraq, 25113, Jordan. aligah.2020@gmail.com.
Saleh Ali AlomariFaculty of Information Technology, Jadara University, Irbid, 21110, Jordan.
Mohammad H AlmomaniDepartment of Mathematics, Facility of Science, The Hashemite University, P.O Box 330127, Zarqa, 13133, Jordan.
Raed Abu ZitarFaculty of Engineering and Computing, Liwa College, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Hazem MigdadyCSMIS Department, Oman College of Management and Technology, 320, Barka, Oman.
Kashif SaleemDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, College of Applied Studies & Community Service, King Saud University, 11362, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Aseel SmeratFaculty of Educational Sciences, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, 19328, Jordan.
Vaclav SnaselFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, 70800, Poruba-Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Amir H GandomiFaculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia. Gandomi@uts.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Aquila Optimizer (AO) is a newly proposed, highly capable metaheuristic algorithm based on the hunting and search behavior of the Aquila bird. However, the AO faces some challenges when dealing with high-dimensional optimization problems due to its narrow exploration capabilities and a tendency to converge prematurely to local optima, which can decrease its performance in complex scenarios. This paper presents a modified form of the previously proposed AO, the Locality Opposition-Based Learning Aquila Optimizer (LOBLAO), aimed at resolving such issues and improving the performance of tasks related to global optimization and data clustering in particular. The proposed LOBLAO incorporates two key advancements: the Opposition-Based Learning (OBL) strategy, which enhances solution diversity and balances exploration and exploitation, and the Mutation Search Strategy (MSS), which mitigates the risk of local optima and ensures robust exploration of the search space. Comprehensive experiments on benchmark test functions and data clustering problems demonstrate the efficacy of LOBLAO. The results reveal that LOBLAO outperforms the original AO and several state-of-the-art optimization algorithms, showcasing superior performance in tackling high-dimensional datasets. In particular, LOBLAO achieved the best average ranking of 1.625 across multiple clustering problems, underscoring its robustness and versatility. These findings highlight the significant potential of LOBLAO to solve diverse and challenging optimization problems, establishing it as a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners.

Indexed as

Aquila optimizerData clustering problemsMeta-heuristics optimization algorithmsOpposition-based learningOptimization problems

Identifiers

PMID40240796
PMCPMC12003646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.