Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40240714›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2025

Comparison of the effects of antibiotic therapy and photobiomodulation with red and infrared lasers on the healing of postextraction sockets of third molars: A randomised controlled trial.

Davisson Alves Pereira, Mariana Silva Bonatto, Samara Souza Santos, Pedro Gomes Junqueira Mendes, Roberto Sales E Pessoa, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Davisson Alves PereiraFederal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.
Mariana Silva BonattoFederal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.
Samara Souza SantosFederal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.
Pedro Gomes Junqueira MendesFederal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.
Roberto Sales E PessoaCentro Universitário Do Triângulo, Uberlândia, Brazil.
Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de OliveiraFederal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil. guioliveiraodonto@hotmail.com.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Financial code 001Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Grants INCT Saúde Oral e Odontologia 406840/2022-9Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-02211-21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of dual-wavelength photobiomodulation (PBMT) compared with antibiotic therapy with amoxicillin on postoperatory healing and symptoms after third molar extraction. Sixty patients were randomly allocated in a parallel model according to the adjunctive therapy applied after extraction of all 4 third molars in one single session (n = 15): CTR: no adjunctive therapy; ATB3: amoxicillin for 3 days; ATB7: amoxicillin for 7 days; PBMT: PBMT at dual wavelengths (λ 660 nm and λ 808 nm, 200 mW). Clinical analyses (assessment of oedema, mouth opening variation, and soft tissue healing) and patient-centred analyses (application of a visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess pain, inflammation, bleeding, difficulty during opening the mouth, and chewing) were performed at 3, 7, 14, 30, and 90 days after the surgical procedure. Radiographic analysis was performed to evaluate bone repair by observing the radiographic density and fractal dimension immediately and 90 days after tooth extraction. PBMT reduced the loss of mouth opening amplitude and the sensation of pain and oedema. There were no differences between the ATB and CTR groups. PBMT has a beneficial effect on postoperative control (reduction in inflammation and pain) after third molar extraction, and ATB does not have a beneficial effect on postoperative control after these surgeries. PBMT reduces morbidity after third molar extraction, whereas antibiotic therapy has no beneficial effect. Trial registration Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (REBEC-RBR- 4bct2 km-Date of registration: 12/06/2021) under number U1111 - 1263-9675.

Indexed as

AmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsLow-Level Light TherapyMolar, ThirdTooth ExtractionTooth SocketWound HealingAdultFemaleHumansInfrared RaysMaleYoung AdultAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic therapyHealingPhotobiomodulationTooth extraction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.