Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40240702›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2025

Estimating 90th Percentile Times To Complete Multiple Pre-Operative Regional Anesthesia Procedures To Mitigate First-Case Start Operating Room Delays Caused by the Nerve Blocks.

Franklin Dexter, Richard H Epstein, Rakesh V Sondekoppam, Anil A Marian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Franklin DexterDepartment of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America. Franklin-Dexter@UIowa.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5897-2484
Richard H EpsteinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine & Pain Management, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8466-3845
Rakesh V SondekoppamDepartment of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1132-9066
Anil A MarianDepartment of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8445-7619

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When multiple patients are scheduled to receive regional blocks as part of their anesthetic, planning insufficient preoperative time can cause first-case operating room delays. Prediction of the time to perform multiple regional blocks depends on the probability distributions (e.g., 90th percentiles) of the procedure completion times. We tested hypotheses that, if supported, can be applied for planning how early regional blocks should start to mitigate late first-case of the day starts. The retrospective cohort study used data from two academic hospital surgical suites for all regional anesthetic procedures performed before the adult patients entered the operating room for a first-case of the day. Days with more total minutes of regional procedures had greater total lateness (negative if early) and tardiness (zero if early) of first-case starts for both suites (all four Bonferroni adjusted P < 0.0001). Increases in the numbers of procedures per day were not associated with significant differences in the 0.5 quantile (median) among days of the time per procedure for both the inpatient surgical suite (unadjusted P = 0.46) and the ambulatory surgery center (P = 0.14). The result supported our hypothesis that average times add arithmetically among procedures. Increases in the numbers of procedures per day were associated with significant decreases in the 0.9 quantile among days of the time per procedure for both the inpatient surgical suite (-0.83 min per procedure, Bonferroni adjusted P < 0.0001) and the ambulatory surgery center (-0.90 min per procedure, adjusted P = 0.0002). Because both slopes were reliably negative, the result supported our second hypothesis that the longest time to plan to complete a series of procedures (represented by the 0.9 quantile) is considerably less than as calculated by taking the sum of the individual procedures' 0.9 quantiles. Quantile regression or an Excel 365 formula based on the log-normal distribution for block times can consequently be used to predict the time when anesthesiologists should start procedures and have a low risk of causing first-case start delays. For example, with 7 blocks, the sum of individual 0.9 quantiles would suggest that the anesthesiologist needs to start ≈35 min earlier than necessary based on the 0.9 quantile. Sufficient time can be planned to perform multiple procedures before the first-case of the day starts using quantile regression or an Excel formula. The estimated times are briefer than the sum of the 0.9 quantiles, but longer than the sum of the 0.5 quantiles.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, ConductionNerve BlockOperating RoomsPreoperative CareAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsAnesthesia, ConductionEfficiency, OrganizationalModels, StatisticalNerve BlockOperating Rooms/organization and administrationPersonnel Staffing and Scheduling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.