ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2025
Ethnicity and involuntary hospitalisation: a study of intersectional effects.
Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reducing ethnic inequalities in experiences and outcomes of mental illness: A realist informed national programme evaluation.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
- More coercion, less support: A latent class analysis of post-incident reviews for mental health inpatients exposed to coercive practice.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeStudies have found that the Mental Health Act is used disproportionally among minoritised ethnicities. Yet, little research has been conducted to understand how the intersectionality of ethnicity with sociodemographic factors relates to involuntary admission. This study aimed to investigate whether an association between ethnicity and involuntary hospitalisation is altered by variations in service-users' sociodemographic positions.
methodsA retrospective cohort study using records from the South London and Maudsley identified 18,569 service-users with a first episode of hospitalisation in a 13-year period. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for involuntary hospitalisation across ethnicities while adjusting for sociodemographic (age, gender, area-level deprivation, homelessness, and migration) and clinical factors (psychiatric diagnosis and HoNOS scores). Interaction analysis was conducted to identify intersectional effects between ethnicity and sociodemographic variables, potentially modifying the odds ratios of involuntary admission across ethnic groups.
resultsIncreased odds of involuntary hospitalisation compared to White British service-users were observed among 10 of the 14 ethnicities, with around, or just under twice the odds observed for Asian Chinese, Black African, and Black Caribbean. Women were found to have increased odds of involuntary admission. Significant interactions were present between ethnicity and age, area-level deprivation, homelessness, and migration in the unadjusted models. These effect modifications were not significant after adjustment for confounders.
conclusionsEthnic inequalities were observed in involuntary hospitalisation among service-users on first admission. No evidence of intersectional effects was present when adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. Further research needs to identify the mechanisms causing the inequalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.