ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Quantifying the impact of mild and moderate myopia on attention in school-age children through eye tracking.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Incidence and Risk Factors of Refractive Error in Children in Spain: CISViT Project.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesBy utilizing eye-tracking data, this study aims to evaluate the impact of both mild and moderate myopia and different refractive correction methods on certain types of attention of school-age children.
methodsIn this prospective case-control study, data was collected from 90 children aged 8 to 10 years old. Participants were classified into three groups based on their spherical lens: mild myopia group (SE: ≤ - 0.50D and > - 3.00D), moderate myopia group (SE: ≤ - 3.00D and > - 6.00D), and control group (SE: ≤ + 0.50D and > - 0.50D). Additionally, children with myopia were subdivided into three subgroups based on refractive correction methods: the uncorrected group, the spectacles corrected group, and the orthokeratology lenses group. The eye-tracking system was used to record and compare attention assessment metrics, including saccade latency, total search time, and saccade accuracy. To enhance result reproducibility, MoCA scale scores were used as a control method to measure attention.
resultsWhen categorized by refraction, MoCA scale scores were lower in the moderate myopia group compared to the control group (p = 0.011). Saccade latency and total search time were slower in both the mild and moderate myopia groups compared to the control group (p < 0.001). A weak positive correlation was observed between spherical lens and total search time (r = 0.260, p = 0.045). When grouped according to correction method, statistically significant differences in saccade latency were evident across all groups (all p < 0.001); the uncorrected group had the longest latency, whereas the orthokeratology lenses group had the shortest. The orthokeratology lenses group exhibited a shorter total search time compared to the uncorrected group (p = 0.018).
conclusionsAffected by myopia, impairments and deficits in attention may occur in school-age children and worsen with the progression of myopia. These cognitive dysfunction can be alleviated by timely refractive correction during the plastic cognitive stage. Compared to the spectacles corrected group, the orthokeratology lenses group showed greater improvement in attention among myopic children. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Myopia can affect people's cognition, function, emotions, and so on. WHAT IS NEW: • We cites eye-movement indicators to quantify the impact of myopia on attention. • Most people study myopic adults, but we selects school-age children whose cognition is in the plasticity period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40240691What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.