Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40240688›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2025

Dual-radiomics based on SHapley additive explanations for predicting hematologic toxicity in concurrent chemoradiotherapy patients.

Luqiao Chen, Zhipeng He, Qianxi Ni, Qionghui Zhou, Xizi Long, Wenbin Yan, Qian Sui, Jiheng Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luqiao Chen *Department of Hematology-Oncology, The First Hospital of Changsha, The Affiliated Changsha Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410005, China.
Zhipeng He *Department of Radiation Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, Chenzhou, 423000, China.
Qianxi NiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013, China.
Qionghui ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013, China.
Xizi LongHunan Province Key Laboratory of Typical Environmental Pollution and Health Hazards, School of Public Health, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, China.
Wenbin YanDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, The First Hospital of Changsha, The Affiliated Changsha Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410005, China.
Qian SuiDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, The First Hospital of Changsha, The Affiliated Changsha Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410005, China.
Jiheng LiuDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, The First Hospital of Changsha, The Affiliated Changsha Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410005, China. liujiheng76@163.com.

Funding

Joint Science and Health Project of Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation in 2024 2024JJ9505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigates the application of a machine learning model that integrates radiomic features and dosiomic features to predict hematologic toxicity (HT) in patients with advanced cervical cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Two integration methods based on SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values for dual-radiomic features were compared.

methodsClinical information, planning CT images, and dose distribution files from 205 patients with advanced cervical cancer treated with CCRT were retrospectively collected. Patients were categorized by HT severity, with 80% of the data used for training and 20% for testing. Radiomic features and dosiomic features were extracted from the same regions of interest, and SHAP-based feature selection was employed. Extreme gradient boosting models were developed using two feature selection schemes: single-step and multi-step. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) values on the test set were used to evaluate model performance.

resultsFor the single-step feature selection scheme, the best hybrid model achieved an AUC of 0.79, sensitivity of 0.67, and specificity of 0.72. For the multi-step feature selection scheme, the best hybrid model achieved an AUC of 0.81, sensitivity of 0.75, and specificity of 0.83. Furthermore, the hybrid models outperformed those using radiomic or dosiomic features alone.

conclusionsCombining radiomic and dosiomic features improves classification performance in predicting HT in patients with advanced cervical cancer undergoing CCRT, with the multi-step SHAP-based feature selection scheme offering additional advantages. These models hold promise for optimizing patient treatment strategies.

Indexed as

DosiomicsFeature selectionHematologic toxicityMachine learningRadiomicsSHAP

Identifiers

PMID40240688
PMCPMC12003243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.