SynthesisUpdates in surgery2026
Efficacy and safety of terlipressin infusion during liver surgery: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although numerous studies have investigated terlipressin (TP) administration in liver surgery to mitigate bleeding, its efficacy remains controversial. This meta-analysis evaluates the effects of TP on estimated blood loss (EBL), blood transfusion requirements, and patient outcomes. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (WOS) for studies on perioperative TP use in liver surgery from their inception through February 2024. Only English-language publications were included. Primary outcomes included EBL and allogeneic blood transfusion volume. Twelve studies involving 988 eligible subjects were included. No significant differences were observed in EBL (weighted mean difference [WMD] = - 99.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 318.41 to 120.24; P = 0.38), red blood cell (RBC) transfusion volume (standardized mean difference [SMD] = - 0.10; 95% CI = - 0.74 to 0.54; P = 0.76), or fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion volume (SMD = 0.07; 95% CI = - 0.24 to 0.37; P = 0.67). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that continuous TP infusion significantly reduced intraoperative EBL (WMD = - 336.22; 95% CI = - 562.13 to - 110.31; P = 0.004). TP infusion does not reduce intraoperative EBL or allogeneic blood transfusion requirements in liver surgery. However, continuous TP infusion may lower EBL.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023450333.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.