Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40240677›Full record

ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2025

Synthetic electroretinogram signal generation using a conditional generative adversarial network.

Mikhail Kulyabin, Aleksei Zhdanov, Irene O Lee, David H Skuse, Dorothy A Thompson, Andreas Maier, Paul A Constable

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mikhail KulyabinPattern Recognition Lab, Department of Computer Science, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-0440-030X
Aleksei ZhdanovVisioMed.AI, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4725-3681
Irene O LeeBehavioural and Brain Sciences Unit, Population Policy and Practice Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0004-6802
David H SkuseBehavioural and Brain Sciences Unit, Population Policy and Practice Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7891-5732
Dorothy A ThompsonThe Tony Kriss Visual Electrophysiology Unit, Clinical and Academic, Department of Ophthalmology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5491-3911
Andreas MaierPattern Recognition Lab, Department of Computer Science, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-7583-9144
Paul A ConstableCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, 5000, Australia. paul.constable@flinders.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-3994-1700

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe electroretinogram (ERG) records the functional response of the retina. In some neurological conditions, the ERG waveform may be altered and could support biomarker discovery. In heterogeneous or rare populations, where either large data sets or the availability of data may be a challenge, synthetic signals with Artificial Intelligence (AI) may help to mitigate against these factors to support classification models.

methodsThis approach was tested using a publicly available dataset of real ERGs, n = 560 (ASD) and n = 498 (Control) recorded at 9 different flash strengths from n = 18 ASD (mean age 12.2 ± 2.7 years) and n = 31 Controls (mean age 11.8 ± 3.3 years) that were augmented with synthetic waveforms, generated through a Conditional Generative Adversarial Network. Two deep learning models were used to classify the groups using either the real only or combined real and synthetic ERGs. One was a Time Series Transformer (with waveforms in their original form) and the second was a Visual Transformer model utilizing images of the wavelets derived from a Continuous Wavelet Transform of the ERGs. Model performance at classifying the groups was evaluated with Balanced Accuracy (BA) as the main outcome measure.

resultsThe BA improved from 0.756 to 0.879 when synthetic ERGs were included across all recordings for the training of the Time Series Transformer. This model also achieved the best performance with a BA of 0.89 using real and synthetic waveforms from a single flash strength of 0.95 log cd s m

conclusionsThe improved performance of the deep learning models with synthetic waveforms supports the application of AI to improve group classification with ERG recordings.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningElectroretinographyNeural Networks, ComputerRetinaAdolescentChildFemaleGenerative Adversarial NetworksHumansMaleBiomarkerNeural networkNeurodevelopmentRetinaWaveform

Identifiers

PMID40240677
PMCPMC12436495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.