ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2025
Machine learning approaches for assessing medication transfer to human breast milk.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the Safety of Medications During Lactation: Lactation safety.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2026Article
- Breast milk-associated mushroom poisoning in a toddler: a case report.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The human milk/plasma (M/P) drug concentration ratio is crucial in pharmacology, especially for breastfeeding mothers undergoing treatment. It determines the extent to which drugs ingested by the mother pass into breast milk, potentially affecting the infant. This study conducted a comprehensive evaluation of multiple machine learning algorithms to assess their effectiveness in predicting the M/P ratio. The dataset consists of 162 drugs and 11 predictor variables. M/P ratios were categorized into two groups of (0, 1) and (≥ 1), and a refined three-category system: (0, < 0.5), (0.5, < 1), and (≥ 1). The ML techniques utilized include K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Neural Networks. We implied the five-fold cross-validation to ensure the model's robustness and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was applied for data visualization. Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) was used in the KNN model selection to balance complexity and explanatory power. In our study, KNN achieved average accuracies of 79% for the two-category system and 60% for the three-category. Random Forest models show 77 and 64% average accuracy, respectively. SVM achieved similar results with 78 and 67%, while Neural Networks have the overall best result among the other models with average accuracies of 82 and 76% accuracy. The study highlights the potential of machine learning (ML) techniques in predicting M/P ratios, offering valuable insights for risk assessment during drug development. These predictive models can serve as a valuable tool for estimating drug transfer into breast milk, helping to bridge knowledge gaps in drug safety for lactating individuals. Further validation and refinement by incorporating larger datasets can enhance their reliability and applicability. Advancing these techniques can support safer medication use and informed clinical decision-making for lactating individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.