ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Diverse accessory techniques and working corridors to enhance the retrosigmoid approach: a versatile option for the treatment of meningiomas of the petroclival region.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeningiomas of the petroclival region (MPR) are among the most challenging skull base tumors to manage surgically. Historically, their treatment carried high risks and significant mortality due to the complex anatomy and proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Advances in microsurgical techniques and neuroimaging have significantly improved surgical outcomes. The retrosigmoid approach is a well-established technique for accessing the posterior cranial fossa, further enhanced by specific working corridors and accessory techniques.
objectiveTo illustrate the versatility of the retrosigmoid approach in managing MPR, emphasizing accessory techniques and tailored working corridors to optimize outcomes.
methodsBetween January 2015 and August 2024, 32 patients with MPR underwent surgical resection using the retrosigmoid approach in the semi-sitting position. Surgical videos were analyzed to identify working corridors and accessory techniques. Preoperative clinical status, extent of resection, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated.
resultsThe study included 32 patients (mean age: 56.2 years; 46.9% female). Accessory techniques were used in 28.1% of cases, including suprameatal tubercle drilling (12.5%), tentorial sectioning (9.4%), and petrous apex drilling (6.2%). Working corridors were adapted based on tumor location: the lateral cerebellar corridor alone was used in 37.5%, supracerebellar alone in 12.5%, and both combined in 50%. New or progressive cranial nerve deficits occurred in 18.75% of patients. No major complications, such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage or infections, were reported.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates how accessory techniques and tailored working corridors enhance the retrosigmoid approach's versatility, establishing it as a safe and effective option for MPR resection. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40240615What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.