Trial reportLeukemia2025
Patient-reported outcomes in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients treated with ponatinib or imatinib: results from the PhALLCON trial.
Trial report in Leukemia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03589326 (A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Study Comparing Ponatinib Versus Imatinib, Administered in Combination With Reduced-Intensity Chemotherapy, in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Study Comparing Ponatinib Versus Imatinib, Administered in Combination With Reduced-Intensity Chemotherapy, in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ ALL)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the Phase 3 PhALLCON trial (NCT03589326), ponatinib demonstrated superior efficacy and comparable safety profile versus imatinib in adults with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Here we report patient-reported outcomes (PRO) from PhALLCON assessed as exploratory endpoints using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu) and EQ-5D-5L. Primary PRO domains included FACT-G physical well-being, FACT-Leu subscale (FACT-LeuS), Trial Outcome Index (TOI), FACT-Leu total score, FACT-G total score, and EQ-5D visual analogue scale. Differences in least-squares mean score changes from baseline to the end of induction (EOI)/consolidation (EOC) and time to confirmed improvement/deterioration were analyzed. Overall treatment tolerability was assessed using the FACT-GP5. Analyses included 238 patients (ponatinib 159, imatinib 79) with ≥1 PRO assessment. Least-squares mean changes from baseline favored ponatinib, with significant and meaningful differences in FACT-LeuS, TOI, and FACT-Leu total score at EOI and across the primary domains except for FACT-LeuS at EOC. Median time to confirmed improvement was shorter with ponatinib versus imatinib for key measures. Ponatinib-treated patients tended to report being less bothered by treatment side effects as assessed by FACT-GP5. These findings highlight ponatinib's potentially favorable impact on health-related quality of life, supporting its use as frontline treatment for Ph+ ALL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.