ArticleScientific reports2025
Circadian photoreception influences loss aversion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gambling behaviour is a persistent and growing societal problem. An unexplored factor that may encourage gambling behaviour is the impact of circadian photoreception on cognitive processes underlying the behaviour. We investigated the influence of circadian photoreception on loss aversion in gambling by altering the blue content of light while maintaining the same visual brightness. Fifteen participants (age 18-27 years, M = 20.40, SD = 2.03) completed an economic decision-making task under blue-enriched and blue-depleted light, of equivalent visual brightness, on separate occasions in a randomised order. The task required participants to choose between taking a risky gamble of a positive and negative outcome, or a less risky guaranteed outcome. Hierarchical Bayesian Modelling was conducted to derive individual parameter estimates for loss aversion, and trial-by-trial performance was analysed using linear mixed models. The findings demonstrated that individuals were significantly less loss averse under blue-enriched light compared to blue-depleted light (β = - .43, 95% CI [- .82, - .04], p = .03). This study shows that exposure to light that preferentially targets circadian photoreception reduces loss aversion, which may encourage gambling behaviour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.