ArticleScientific reports2025
Performance of Xpert MTB/RIF ultra for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis in children using cerebrospinal fluid.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Etiologic diagnosis of suspected tuberculous meningitis by multiplex PCR of cerebrospinal fluid.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Diagnosis of Tuberculous Meningitis: Integrating Clinical Assessment and Molecular Diagnostics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Six-year retrospective comparison of GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra PCR and culture for pediatric tuberculosis diagnosis in non-sputum samples.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- The microbiological diagnosis of pediatric tuberculosis: focus on the Ultra test.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2026Article
- Clinical utility of targeted next-generation sequencing for rapid detection, species differentiation, drug resistance profiling, and prognostic evaluation inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid and reliable diagnostic tests for tuberculous meningitis (TBM) in children remain limited. This study evaluated the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra), an improved version of Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert), for detecting TBM in children using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Children (0-14 years) presumptive of TBM were enrolled prospectively from three tertiary level hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh, from December 2019 to January 2022. CSF was tested by Ultra, Xpert, Lowenstein-Jensen (L-J) culture, and acid-fast bacilli (AFB) microscopy. Diagnostic performance was assessed against clinical case definitions, composite microbiological reference standard (CMRS), and L-J culture. Of 187 children, Ultra detected TBM in 23.4% of cases, significantly higher than the 9.1% detected by Xpert (p < 0.001). Compared to the clinical case definition of probable and definite TBM, Ultra exhibited a sensitivity of 88% (44/50), markedly outperforming Xpert (34%, 17/50) and L-J culture (30%, 15/50) (p < 0.001). Against the CMRS, Ultra's sensitivity was 100% (44/44), compared to Xpert (38.6%, 17/44) and L-J culture (34.1%, 15/44) (p < 0.001). AFB microscopy showed very low sensitivity (2.3%, 1/44). Negative predictive values for both clinical case definition and CMRS were higher for Ultra (95.8-100%) than Xpert (80.6-84.1%) and L-J culture (79.7-83.1%) (p < 0.001). Compared to gold standard L-J culture, Ultra's sensitivity (100%, 15/15) was also higher than Xpert (93.3%, 14/15) (p = 0.316), with specificities of 83.1% (143/172) and 98.3% (169/172), respectively. Ultra detected 26 TBM cases missed by other tests, with most (84.6%) in the 'trace detected' category. Due to the high performance, Ultra can be used widely at health care settings of high TB burden countries like Bangladesh for rapid and accurate diagnosis of paediatric TBM using CSF samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.