ArticleScientific reports2025
Implant placement parameters are associated with post operative dynamic varus and valgus knee angle in robotic assisted TKA.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Precision soft tissue balance in robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a bibliometric and visualization analysis of dynamic gap equilibration.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Targeting ligament boundaries rather than alignment boundaries in augmented-reality-assisted total knee arthroplasty ensures comparable gait patterns between operated and contralateral limbs.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- Kinematic tracking of the small bones of the wrist in sequential 3DCT and dynamic 4DCT volume images using open-source Hierarchical 3D Registration, a module within SlicerAutoscoperBiomedical engineering online · 2026Article
- Integrating preoperative gait kinematics into total knee arthroplasty planning: Associations with intraoperative robotic laxities and prediction of postoperative function.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- A comparative study of clinical and radiographic outcomes in total knee arthroplasty assisted by the CT-free Smith & Nephew CORI robotic system versus the Brainlab Knee3 navigation system.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Knee kinesiography in 2026: Current and future applications for digital orthopaedics and personalised total knee arthroplasty: A narrative review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- The HKA axis varies significantly with knee motion: A robot-assisted intraoperative evaluation during total knee arthroplasty supports the use of dynamic, not static, alignment classifications.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), correcting or maintaining coronal knee alignment is essential for high patient function and satisfaction. However, coronal knee alignment achieved during surgery frequently changes with standing, possibly reflecting the change in knee loading and varus-valgus that occurs between non-weightbearing and weightbearing. Moreover, joint alignment also varies as the knee joint flexes and with dynamic activities. While studies have reported coronal knee alignment achieved intraoperatively during TKA surgery, they rarely trace back to the surgical choices and parameters that may predict longer-term knee alignment. Robotic-assisted TKA enables the delivery of a precise surgical plan including the surgical parameters that achieve the final position of the implants, the final intraoperative knee alignment, and the associated soft tissue balance. The objectives of this study were to determine the relationship between intraoperative alignment and in vivo static and dynamic alignment and varus-valgus during tasks of daily living 1-year after surgery, and to quantify the surgical parameters that predict in vivo static and dynamic varus-valgus during tasks of daily living. Activities requiring minimal flexion, like gait and step down, maintained knee alignment consistent with that achieved intraoperatively. However, as knee flexion angles increased during the lunge, knee extension, and leg press dynamic activities, there was a poor relationship between delivered alignment and varus-valgus angle of the knee. Medial gap in flexion, femoral implant valgus-varus and internal-external rotation alignment, and tibial valgus-varus rotation and slope were the most influential surgical parameters, significantly impacting patient frontal plane knee kinematics. These results may inform preoperative planning by illustrating how varus-valgus alignment is affected by proposed surgical plans and thus help reduce the variability in delivered dynamic varus-valgus, ultimately improving long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.