Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40240511›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparing machine learning models for predicting preoperative DVT incidence in elderly hypertensive patients with hip fractures: a retrospective analysis.

Xue Ge, Lan Yao, Yan Liu, Yi Wang, Fang Zhang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Preoperative Venous Thromboembolism in Elderly Patients with Hip Fractures: Independent Risk Factors and Interactions Between D-Dimer and Clinical Variables.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xue GeDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, 066000, Hebei, China.
Lan YaoThe First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, 066000, Hebei, China.
Yan LiuDepartment of Respiratory, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China.
Yi WangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, 066000, Hebei, China. wangyqhd@163.com.
Fang ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, 066000, Hebei, China. zf001020@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hip fractures in the elderly present a significant public health challenge globally, especially among patients with hypertension, who are at an increased risk of developing preoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT). DVT not only heightens surgical risks but also severely impacts the rehabilitation and quality of life of patients. Early risk assessment and management in this population are therefore critically important. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning-based predictive model to enhance the accuracy of predicting preoperative DVT in elderly patients with hypertension undergoing hip fracture surgery, thereby optimizing preoperative assessment and management. A retrospective study design was employed, selecting patients with hypertension and hip fractures treated at the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao from January 2018 to December 2022. Key predictive factors were identified using LASSO regression, and logistic regression was utilized to construct both a nomogram and an online interactive nomogram. Various machine learning algorithms were also employed to build predictive models. The contribution of variables in the models was explained using SHAP values, and model performance was evaluated through ROC curves, AUC values, and other statistical methods. The study included 637 patients, with LASSO regression selecting key variables that were further used to develop a logistic regression-based nomogram and its online version, providing intuitive tools for assessing DVT incidence. Among the multiple machine learning predictive models, the LightGBM model exhibited the best performance, achieving an AUC of 0.910. The model's effectiveness and reliability were confirmed through decision curves, calibration plots, and precision-recall curves. SHAP value analysis highlighted the significance of factors such as age, time from injury to hospital admission, atrial fibrillation, C-reactive protein, hypoalbuminemia, and D-dimer levels in the predictions, enhancing the model's transparency and interpretability. This study successfully developed a logistic regression-based nomogram and multiple machine learning algorithms to predict the risk of preoperative DVT in elderly hypertensive patients with hip fractures. The nomogram provides clinicians with a practical tool for rapid risk assessment, thus optimizing patient management and prognosis. The LightGBM model, recommended for its high predictive accuracy, along with SHAP value analysis, enhanced the transparency and clinical applicability of the models. These findings not only deepen our understanding of DVT incidence factors but also demonstrate the potential of machine learning technologies in enhancing medical decision-making and advancing precision medicine.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesHypertensionMachine LearningVenous ThrombosisAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIncidenceLogistic ModelsMaleNomogramsPreoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsDeep vein thrombosisHip fractureHypertensionMachine learningSHAP value

Identifiers

PMID40240511
PMCPMC12003801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.