ArticleScientific reports2025
Efficacy analysis and prognostic factors of first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a real-world study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Real-World Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review of Comparative Cohort Studies.Current oncology reports · 2026Pooled it
- Real-world serplulimab plus chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in china: an external validation of ASTRUM-005 trial.BMC medicine · 2026Observational
- Combined Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI)-Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) as a Prognostic Tool in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with First-Line Chemo-Immunotherapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Key Tumor Responsive ZIF-8 Nanocarriers for Effective Anti-Cancer Therapeutics.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- From Simple Scores to Intelligent Systems: Encouraging the Development, Validation and Adoption of Robust Prognostic Tools in Small Cell Lung Cancer.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is a highly aggressive subtype of lung cancer with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy have demonstrated significant efficacy in several clinical trials. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC and identify prognostic factors based on real-world data. This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 349 patients with ES-SCLC treated at Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine from January 2018 to August 2023. The patients were divided into a combination group (chemotherapy plus immunotherapy, n = 173) and a chemotherapy group (chemotherapy alone, n = 176) based on their treatment regimens. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was treatment-related adverse events. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed, and Cox regression models were used to analyze the factors influencing OS and PFS. The median OS in the combination group was 14.9 months, significantly longer than 11.9 months in the chemotherapy group (P < 0.001). After applying Propensity Score Matching (PSM) to minimize selection bias, the survival advantage remained statistically significant. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates in the combination group were 62.4%, 42.8%, and 19.5%, respectively, compared to 50.2%, 20.8%, and 9.6% in the chemotherapy group. The median PFS in the combination group was 5.4 months, also significantly longer than the 3.8 months observed in the chemotherapy group (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified chemotherapy alone, ECOG performance status, and number of metastatic sites as independent risk factors for poorer OS and PFS (P < 0.001). A separate analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between tumor response (CR/PR/SD/PD) and survival outcomes, which showed that patients with CR/PR had significantly better OS and PFS compared to those with SD/PD (P < 0.001). These findings reinforce the clinical importance of achieving tumor response. There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups, with most adverse events being grade 1-2, and no grade 5 adverse events were reported. This study demonstrates that chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy significantly prolongs OS and PFS in patients with ES-SCLC without substantially increasing treatment-related adverse events. This combination therapy shows promising clinical value for improving long-term prognosis in ES-SCLC patients. Future studies should explore potential biomarkers to optimize individualized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.