ArticleScientific reports2025
Group decision-making framework using generalized heronian mean operators in quasi rung orthopair fuzzy environment with applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective decision-making in complex environments often requires handling fuzzy data with interdependencies. The generalized Heronian mean and geometric Heronian mean operators have proven useful for such analysis. However, existing methods struggle to capture correlations among pq-quasi rung orthopair fuzzy (pqQROF) numbers. This study addresses this gap by extending these operators to the pqQROF setting and developing a novel hybrid decision-making framework. The proposed framework integrates a distance measure, rank sum (RS) method, and aggregation operators to determine both objective and subjective criteria weights. The applicability of the approach is demonstrated through two case studies: project selection and university selection. Finally, a comparative evaluation of the developed operators against existing ones is conducted to assess their effectiveness and highlight the superiority of the proposed decision-making algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.