ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of the Toumai robotic system in partial nephrectomy and key system features.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07792109 (Implementation Of A Telesurgery Program At A Referral Center For Robotic Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementation Of A Telesurgery Program At A Referral Center For Robotic Surgery: Feasibility And Safety Evaluation - Gemelli TeleSurgery Program (GTSP)
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Novel multiport robotic systems versus da vinci multiport robotic system in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical and oncological outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluating the Toumai MT‑1000 for urologic surgery: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis with remote and on-site experiences.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Beyond Da Vinci: Comparative Review of Next-Generation Robotic Platforms in Urologic Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The predictive utility of the E-PASS score for postoperative complications in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a retrospective cohort study.BMC urology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robotic partial nephrectomy is a standard procedure in urology, but its widespread use is limited by the high cost and technical constraints of current systems. New robotic systems are being developed to enhance affordability and accessibility, expanding the availability of advanced robotic surgery to a broader range of healthcare facilities and patients. This study evaluates the feasibility and safety of the Toumai system in partial nephrectomy, examining its advanced features and their potential impact on surgical precision and operational efficiency. In this single center study, eleven patients underwent partial nephrectomy using Toumai. Primary endpoints were feasibility and safety, while secondary outcomes included perioperative outcomes. All surgeries were completed successfully without conversion, minimal complications, and no major equipment failures. The median operative time was 107 min, docking time was 8 min, and estimated blood loss was 50 ml. One off-clamp partial nephrectomy was successfully performed and median warm ischemia time was 9 min in the remaining cases. Postoperatively, renal function remained stable, and surgical margins were negative in all cases. These preliminary results suggest that partial nephrectomy can be safely performed using the Toumai robotic system. The system's advanced features, including sensory feedback, high-frequency response, and enhanced imaging technologies, likely contributed to favorable surgical outcomes with minimal complications. However, these initial findings warrant further validation through larger studies and longer follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.