ArticleScientific reports2025
An interpretable framework for gastric cancer classification using multi-channel attention mechanisms and transfer learning approach on histopathology images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence for facial fracture detection: a systematic review.Oral radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence at the gut-oral microbiota frontier: mapping machine learning tools for gastric cancer risk prediction.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Pooled it
- Health behavior risk prediction in metabolic syndrome patients: development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model via multisource heterogeneous data integration.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Hybrid diagnostic framework for bone cancer detection using deep learning and radiomics analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A hybrid dual-stream CNN framework with dynamic data augmentation and improved Manta Ray Foraging Optimization for robust glaucoma detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An interpretable deep learning framework for intestinal metaplasia detection in gastric histopathology images.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Building novel LLM-enabled explainable ensemble transformer models combining endoscopic and CT images for discriminating the different grades of gastrointestinal cancers.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- CA-YOLO: An Efficient YOLO-Based Algorithm with Context-Awareness and Attention Mechanism for Clue Cell Detection in Fluorescence Microscopy Images.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- FC-YOLO: a fast inference backbone and lightweight attention mechanism-enhanced YOLO for detecting gastric adenocarcinoma in pathological image.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Multi-convolutional neural networks for cotton disease detection using synergistic deep learning paradigm.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The importance of gastric cancer (GC) and the role of deep learning techniques in categorizing GC histopathology images have recently increased. Identifying the drawbacks of traditional deep learning models, including lack of interpretability, inability to capture complex patterns, lack of adaptability, and sensitivity to noise. A multi-channel attention mechanism-based framework is proposed that can overcome the limitations of conventional deep learning models by dynamically focusing on relevant features, enhancing extraction, and capturing complex relationships in medical data. The proposed framework uses three different attention mechanism channels and convolutional neural networks to extract multichannel features during the classification process. The proposed framework's strong performance is confirmed by competitive experiments conducted on a publicly available Gastric Histopathology Sub-size Image Database, which yielded remarkable classification accuracies of 99.07% and 98.48% on the validation and testing sets, respectively. Additionally, on the HCRF dataset, the framework achieved high classification accuracy of 99.84% and 99.65% on the validation and testing sets, respectively. The effectiveness and interchangeability of the three channels are further confirmed by ablation and interchangeability experiments, highlighting the remarkable performance of the framework in GC histopathological image classification tasks. This offers an advanced and pragmatic artificial intelligence solution that addresses challenges posed by unique medical image characteristics for intricate image analysis. The proposed approach in artificial intelligence medical engineering demonstrates significant potential for enhancing diagnostic precision by achieving high classification accuracy and treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.