Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40240452›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development and psychometric evaluation of the needs assessment questionnaire for family caregivers of end-of-life older adults in home hospice care.

Lei Wang, Yaru Li, Rui Zhao, Hongyu Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lei WangCollege of Nursing, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, 121000, China.
Yaru LiCollege of Nursing, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, 121000, China.
Rui ZhaoCollege of Nursing, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, 121000, China.
Hongyu LiCollege of Nursing, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, 121000, China. reda4673@sina.com.

Funding

the Chinese Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Action for Health Promotion in the Elderly (2021-2025), First Action Program Fund No. CAGG-2021-04-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As care moves from disease-centered to family-centered, meeting the needs of caregivers becomes more and more important. The study was to develop and validate a family caregiver needs assessment questionnaire for home hospice care of the end-of-life older adult in Mainland China. Based on the guidance of Harmony Nursing Theory, 48 initial questionnaire items were initially drafted through literature review, interviews with 12 family caregivers of the end-of-life older adult, and group discussions among research team members. Two rounds of expert review and small sample testing resulted in a 36-item prediction questionnaire. From October to December 2023, 223 family caregivers of the end-of-life older adult in Jinzhou City, Liaoning Province were selected to verify the questionnaire. The final questionnaire included 34 items. With a cumulative variance contribution rate of 71.281%, the exploratory factor analysis identified six common factors. The questionnaire's total Cronbach coefficient was 0.910, and the retest reliability was 0.868. Its content validity index was 0.982, and the items' content validity index ranged from 0.83 to 1.00. The questionnaire items compilation and screening methods are scientifically reliable. In the future, healthcare can utilize the questionnaire to fully assess the needs of family caregivers of older adult patients end-of-life at home.

Indexed as

CaregiversHome Care ServicesHospice CareNeeds AssessmentPsychometricsTerminal CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChinaFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsFamily caregiverHospice careNeedOlder adultQuestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID40240452
PMCPMC12003740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.