ArticleScientific reports2025
Risk for development of vancomycin resistant enterococci bacteremia among colonized or infected patients, a multiple center, retrospective study in Palestine.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors associated with the development of multidrug-resistant bloodstream infection in patients with colonization: a case-control retrospective study.IJID regions · 2026Article
- Extracellular vesicles derived from Enterococcus faecalis: inflammatory activation does not require internalization.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence applications in biofilm research: computational approaches for biofilm analysis and antimicrobial prediction.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) is one of the key antibiotic-resistant pathogens that challenges the health system with its threat to human health. Most VRE infections occur in hospital settings as these pathogens are known to colonize hospital environments and maintain their viability for long periods. Without good infection control measures, these pathogens can spread in the hospital setting and cause hospital-acquired infections including bacteremia. In this study, we report the isolation of VRE from patient samples hospitalized in four Palestinian hospitals. The American Society for Microbiology proceedings were utilized to culture and identify VRE. During the 5-year study period between December 2020 and March 2024, 736 VRE isolates were detected, and 30 (4.76%) patients with bacteremia were reported. Excellent infection control measures including active surveillance swabs, contact precaution and following strict isolation protocols were important to limit the spread of these pathogens, as well as limiting the consumption of antibiotics, especially Vancomycin. In this research article, we discuss the detection of VRE in the different hospitals located in West Bank and East Jerusalem. We also analyze the prevalence of VRE in other body sites including anal surveillance swab, urine, wound and stool cultures that may be associated with developing VRE bacteremia. The cumulative average of VRE causing bacteremia was of urinary origin, followed by wound and stool positive cultures, respectively. Hospital number 2 had the highest risk of developing bacteremia in patients with other VRE positive culture or swab with a percentage of 11.3%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.