Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40240435›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2025

Cost-effectiveness of population-based expanded reproductive carrier screening for genetic diseases in Australia: a microsimulation analysis.

Deborah Schofield, Evelyn Lee, Jayamala Parmar, Adriana Castelo Taboada, Matthew Hobbs, Nigel Laing, Rupendra Shrestha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The clinical utility of carrier screening.NPJ genomic medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. What's new in EJHG this autumn.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Deborah Schofield *Centre for Economic Impacts of Genomic Medicine, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1658-494X
Evelyn Lee *Leeder Centre for Health Policy, Economics & Data (The Leeder Centre), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. evelyn.lee@mq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-4434-1304
Jayamala ParmarCentre for Economic Impacts of Genomic Medicine, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia.
Adriana Castelo TaboadaCentre for Economic Impacts of Genomic Medicine, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4104-5403
Matthew HobbsComputational Biology, Data Science Platform, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6879-1369
Nigel LaingCentre for Medical Research University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5111-3732
Rupendra ShresthaCentre for Economic Impacts of Genomic Medicine, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5455-0735

Funding

Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP1146134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using the Australian Census survey 2021 as base population, a microsimulation model, PreconMOD was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of population-based expanded reproductive carrier screening (RCS) for 569 recessive conditions from the health service and societal perspectives. The model simulated the effect of expanded RCS including the downstream interventions for at-risk couples on cost and outcomes. The comparators were (i) no population screening (ii) limited screening for cystic fibrosis, spinal muscular atrophy, and fragile X syndrome and (iii) a 300 conditions screening panel. Averted affected births and health service cost with expanded RCS were projected to year 2061. At a 50% uptake, our model predicts that expanded RCS is cost saving (i.e., higher quality-adjusted life-years and lower costs) compared with other screening strategies in the model from the health service and societal perspectives. The number of affected births averted in a single cohort would increase from 84 [95% confidence interval (CI) 60-116] with limited screening to 2067 (95%CI 1808-2376) with expanded RCS. Expanded RCS was cost-saving compared to the 300-conditions screening panel. Indirect cost accounted for about one-third of the total costs associated with recessive disorders. Our model predicts that the direct treatment cost associated with current limited 3 genes screening would increase by 20% each year to A$73.4 billion to the health system by 2061. Our findings contribute insights on the cost burden of genetic diseases and the economic benefits of expanded RCS to better informed resource allocation decisions.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisGenetic Carrier ScreeningGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic TestingAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleQuality-Adjusted Life Years

Identifiers

PMID40240435
PMCPMC12402222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.