ArticleScientific reports2025
Clinical and genetic analysis of oral and nasal staphylococcus aureus isolates in dental patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photoinduced Fluorescence Changes in Selected Bacterial Strains Under 405 nm Laser Excitation: An In Vitro Hue-Based Monitoring Approach.Micromachines · 2026Article
- A subclade-associated genomic deletion encompassing vraDEH confers increased susceptibility to nisin A and bacitracin in Staphylococcus aureus CC121.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dental Consultation in Initially Unknown-SourceAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Methicillin-resistantiScience · 2026Review
- Nasal colonization, risk factors, and antibiotic resistance of methicillin-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- The role of dental assessment in source identification duringFrontiers in oral health · 2026Review
- Sequential drug release from dual-responsive scaffold with ultrasound-enhanced efficacy for infectious oral ulcer therapy.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Antimicrobial Properties of Different Dental Cleaning Tablets Against S. aureus Grown on Two Denture Base Materials.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus is a common bacterium that sometimes causes various pyogenic diseases. Methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections are particularly difficult to treat. Recently, MRSA has been spreading in the community, so it is important to determine the prevalence of MRSA in the community and to conduct epidemiological studies from genetic and statistical perspectives. In this study, S. aureus/MRSA was isolated from the oral and nasal cavities of 504 dental patients (65 inpatients and 439 outpatients). Sixty-two S. aureus strains and 9 MRSA strains were isolated from the oral cavity, and 112 S. aureus strains and 21 MRSA strains were isolated from the nasal cavity. Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) analysis showed ST8 was high (18 isolates) among 30 MRSA isolates, whereas among 144 methicillin sensitive isolates, ST15 (25 isolates) and ST8 (20 isolates) were high. Statistical analysis of the patients' clinical status revealed a correlation between oral S. aureus and denture use. Among the 34 patients from whom S. aureus was isolated from both sites, 25 had the same ST, and 23 showed below 40 single-nucleotide polymorphisms which are considered to be identical strains. Our study revealed various properties of S. aureus/MRSA in the oral and nasal cavities as commensals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.