ArticleInternational wound journal2025
Evaluation of the Biophysical Signs of Healing in the Protocolized Use of the High Capillarity Dressing: A Pilot Study.
Article in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Suture Materials: Conventional and Stimulatory-Responsive Absorbable Polymers with Biomimetic Function.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a high-capillarity dressing on chronic wound healing, using hyperspectral imaging to assess biophysical parameters. This quasi-experimental pilot study involved eight adults with chronic ulcers treated with the high-capillarity dressing for 4 weeks. Primary outcomes included pH, temperature, and oxygen saturation, measured using hyperspectral imaging, along with wound area assessed with ImageJ. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, evaluated using the EQ-5D-5L and Wound QoL-17 scales. Data were collected at baseline, 7, 14, and 21 days, and analysed using SPSS. Results showed a significant reduction in lesion size (p < 0.05) and pain (p < 0.001) following treatment. Biophysical assessments revealed a significant decrease in pH (p = 0.004), but no significant changes were observed in other parameters (oxygen saturation, NIR, TWI, TLI). A significant correlation was found between oxygen saturation and pH (p < 0.005). The results suggest that the high-capillarity dressing improves chronic wound healing by reducing lesion size, promoting pH acidification, and improving superficial oxygenation. Additionally, the dressing controlled edema and eliminated infection signs without antibiotics, suggesting its potential in optimising the wound healing environment. These findings highlight the need for further research into the clinical application of this dressing in chronic wound management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.