Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40240140›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2025

My 50 Year Odyssey to Develop Behavioral Methods to Let Me See Quickly How Well Kittens See.

Donald E Mitchell

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Donald E MitchellDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada d.e.mitchell@dal.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3441-6333

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of animal models to an understanding of the development and plasticity of visual functions was evident from the outset of the long experimental collaboration of David Hubel and Torsten Wiesel in the early 1960s. Their initial work on kittens had massive impact in part because of the recognition that kittens share with primates substantial similarities of visual system organization and plasticity (e.g., eye-specific lamination of the thalamus and columnar organization of the visual cortex), as well as comparable visual abilities (including stereoscopic vision). In addition the plasticity demonstrated in response to early periods of selected visual exposure provided a glimpse into the origins of amblyopia. Five decades ago my laboratory developed a method for the fast measurement of visual thresholds in kittens in order to capture the consequences for spatial vision of the rapid physiological changes that occurred in the visual cortex during both typical development and those that follow various forms of early selected visual exposure. This paper describes the further evolution of the method with an emphasis on the testing procedures that enable fast capture of spatial visual thresholds such as visual acuity on every animal and occasion. In these respects, the method emulated features of basic tests of human spatial vision as applied in clinical settings. As with clinical tests for humans, the method includes benchmarks of low vision necessary to document the profound immediate consequences of early selected visual deprivation and the speed and extent of the subsequent recovery.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalVisual PerceptionAnimalsCatsHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyVisual AcuityVisual Cortexcritical perioddarknessvisionvisual acuityvisual deprivation

Identifiers

PMID40240140
PMCPMC12011136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.