Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40240059›Full record

SynthesisEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2025

Characteristics of scores used for quantitative lung ultrasound in neonates: a systematic review.

Victor Sartorius, Stéphanie Brunet, Daniele De Luca

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The effect of postnatal steroids on lung ultrasound scores and extubation readiness in very low birth weight infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Quantitative lung ultrasound in neonates: tried-and-tested systems simplify bedside use.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Article
  11. An elegant review - but a complicated bedside? Rethinking dual protocols for neonatal lung ultrasound.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Anaesthesia-induced atelectasis in a rat model (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Victor SartoriusDepartment of Neonatal Intensive Care, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Université Paris-Cité, APHP, Paris, France victor.sartorius@aphp.fr.
Stéphanie BrunetDepartment of Neonatal Intensive Care, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Université Paris-Cité, APHP, Paris, France.
Daniele De LucaDivision of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, "A. Béclère" Medical Center, Paris Saclay University Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuantitative lung ultrasound is increasingly being used in neonatology. The aim of this study is to identify the lung ultrasound scores (LUS) available for use in neonates, describe their characteristics and determine which LUS are most used and validated.

methodsA systematic review of the literature was conducted following PRISMA-S (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Protocols extension for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews) guidelines. Articles describing LUS in newborn animals and human neonates, published up to March 2024, were searched in the PubMed and Embase databases.

resultsOut of 757 identified studies, 121 were included. Most of the articles were published in the past 5 years, predominantly by European investigators. They described 32 different LUS. Only 10 (31.4%) of these LUS had undergone at least one validation attempt and only 15 (48.4%) used the four-step scoring scale (

conclusionsThe most commonly used and validated score, consistent with adult critical care practice, should be the standard for assessing lung aeration in neonates.

Indexed as

LungLung DiseasesAnimalsHumansInfant, NewbornPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40240059
PMCPMC12000906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.