ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Investigating the interplay between RNA structural dynamics and RNA chemical probing experiments.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- MERGE-RNA: a physics-based model to predict RNA secondary structure ensembles with chemical probing.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Iron overload suppresses LKB1 and induces IL36G anti-tumor immunity in PDAC metastasis.Science advances · 2026Article
- De novo design of RNA pseudoknots with deep learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Alternative Splicing: Molecular Mechanisms, Biological Functions, Diseases, and Potential Therapeutic Targets.MedComm · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Small molecule chemical probes that covalently bond atoms of flexible nucleotides are widely employed in RNA structure determination. Atomistic molecular dynamic (MD) simulations recently suggested that RNA-probe binding can be cooperative, leading to measured reactivities that differ from expected trends as probe concentrations are varied. Here, we use selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE), dimethyl sulfate (DMS) chemical probing, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to explore the relationship between RNA structural dynamics and chemical probe reactivity. Our NMR chemical exchange experiments revealed that SHAPE-reactive base-paired nucleotides exhibit high imino proton exchange rates. Additionally, we find that as the concentration of a probe increases, some nucleotides' modification rates shift unexpectedly. For instance, some base-paired nucleotides that are unreactive at one probe concentration become reactive at another, often corresponding with a shift in the modification rate of the complementary nucleotide. We believe this effect can be harnessed to infer pairing interactions. Lastly, our results suggest that the overmodification of an RNA can impact its conformational dynamics, leading to modulations in the structural ensembles representing the RNA's fold. Our findings suggest an intricate interplay between RNA conformational dynamics and chemical probing reactivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.