ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2025
Participants' reactions to the inclusion of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI) measures in an established large-scale cohort: The California Teachers Study.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations are more likely than non-SGM populations to experience poor health outcomes but are underrepresented in research. The California Teachers Study (CTS) is a large prospective observational cohort that, in its 2017-2019 survey, included sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) measures and also asked participants to provide feedback on the questionnaire. We conducted an inductive content analysis of participants' feedback responses and used these qualitative codes to a) identify which participants commented on SOGI and b) establish whether these participants had a positive, negative, or ambiguous reaction to the measures. We used Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression to evaluate whether demographic factors were associated with reaction type. A total of 373(2%) of 19,496 respondents commented on the SOGI questions. Of these, 41% had negative reactions, 35% had ambiguous reactions, and 25% had positive reactions. Younger age (<65 years) was positively associated with positive reaction (OR=2.30; 95%CI, 1.23-4.32). Non-white participants had lower adjusted odds of having a negative reaction to the SOGI measures compared to white participants (OR=0.38; 95%CI, 0.17-0.87). In this large established study of older adults, feedback on SOGI measures was rare but differed in frequency and content by participants' demographics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.