ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025
Functional limitations in 2004-22 among Europeans aged 55-69 years: time trends according to labor market group and impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In terms of work ability, impacts of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on functional ability warrant investigation. The aim is to explore trends in functional limitations in 2004-22 focusing on the impacts of the pandemic among older working-aged Europeans in different labor market groups and at different levels of COVID-19 stringency policies. Data come from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) collected in 2004-22. Individuals aged 55-69 years from 27 countries were included (N = 245 060). Outcome was functional limitations (Global Activity Limitation Index). Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze time trends and COVID-19 impacts within labor market groups and at different levels of COVID-19 stringency policies. In 2004-22, the likelihood of functional limitations increased slightly among men but remained the same among women. Functional limitations were more likely in countries with low and moderate as compared to high COVID-19 stringency (which represents mostly Southern Europe) in both women and men. During the ∼1st year of the pandemic, likelihood of functional limitations decreased especially in countries with moderate COVID-19 stringency. Decreases were observed in all labor market groups. During the ∼2nd year of the pandemic, the likelihood of functional limitations increased in time but not statistically significantly in most groups. Policymakers should be aware of trends in functional limitations and the impacts of policy decisions while pursuing to prolong work careers. Further investigation is required to verify our findings and to explore underlying reasons behind the decreases in functional limitations after the pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.