Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40239950›Full record

ArticleUltraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980)2026

A core curriculum of point-of-care ultrasound examinations for frontline physicians in primary care: results from a European Delphi study.

Camilla Aakjær Andersen, Thomas Løkkegaard, Leizl Joy Nayahangan, Hazel Edwards, Mihai Sorin Iacob, Kristina Lebedevaite, Mateusz Kosiak, Elena Codruta Gheorghe, Adib Salim, Viktor Rüttermann and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Camilla Aakjær AndersenCenter for General Practice, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5933-748X
Thomas LøkkegaardCenter for General Practice, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Leizl Joy NayahanganCAMES Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6179-1622
Hazel EdwardsBMUS, British Medical Ultrasound Society, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Mihai Sorin IacobCentre for Preventive Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Victor Babes Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7641-8687
Kristina LebedevaiteAntalgija, Medical Practice, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Mateusz KosiakSonographic educational platform, Eduson, Gdansk, Poland.
Elena Codruta GheorgheUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Adib SalimPediatrics, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Viktor RüttermannHausärztliche Gemeinschaftspraxis Nordholter Weg, Medical Practice, Drensteinfurt, Germany.
Caroline EwertsenDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen OE, Denmark.
Christian JenssenBrandenburg Institute of Clinical Ultrasound (BICUS), Medical University Brandenburg, Neuruppin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) has found its way into primary care in some, but not all, European countries. A prerequisite for achieving Europe-wide comparable diagnostic reliability of PoCUS performed by primary care physicians is high-quality training that is limited to relevant, frequently encountered PoCUS applications that are easy to learn and master. A European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine (EFSUMB) task force performed a brainstorming exercise to identify all possible ultrasound examinations that could be performed in primary care. A 3-stage Delphi process was launched. The Delphi panelists were 95 primary care physicians from 28 European countries with more than 2 years of experience using and teaching ultrasound. Solely focusing on the complexity of performing PoCUS, the panelists reduced the brainstorming list in a stepwise manner to a basic core curriculum intended for primary care frontline physicians including 40 diagnostic PoCUS examinations within 13 different anatomical areas and no ultrasound-guided procedures. A 75% cut-off was used for agreement. Despite the great heterogeneity of the Delphi panel representing different views and contexts from across Europe, kappa statistics showed substantial or moderate agreement across Delphi rounds 2 and 3 for 85% of the 40 diagnostic PoCUS applications. The results of this study offer guidance for EFSUMB to establish training recommendations for a basic core curriculum that can be adapted to the needs of different regions of Europe and thus create a basis for PoCUS to become a reliable diagnostic tool in primary care across Europe, based on common quality standards.

Indexed as

CurriculumDelphi TechniquePoint-of-Care SystemsPrimary Health CareClinical CompetenceEuropeHumansUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40239950
PMCPMC13065360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.