Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40239758›Full record

ReviewProgress in retinal and eye research2025

Animal models for the evaluation of retinal stem cell therapies.

Biju B Thomas, Deepthi S Rajendran Nair, Mana Rahimian, Amr K Hassan, Thuy-Linh Tran, Magdalene J Seiler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in retinal and eye research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Biju B ThomasDepartment of Ophthalmology, USC Roski Eye Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; USC Ginsburg Institute for Biomedical Therapeutics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Deepthi S Rajendran NairDepartment of Ophthalmology, USC Roski Eye Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Mana RahimianDepartment of Ophthalmology, USC Roski Eye Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Amr K HassanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California, Irvine, Irvine CA, United States.
Thuy-Linh TranStem Cell Research Center, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Magdalene J SeilerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California, Irvine, Irvine CA, United States; Stem Cell Research Center, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States; Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States; Center for Translational Vision Research, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States. Electronic address: mseiler@uci.edu.

Funding

Univ.of Calif., Irvine Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA062203 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Christine Hui · 1994 to 2026
$57.9M
Uncover Strategies Used By Biological SystemsP50GM076516 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI BARDWELL, LEE S · 2007 to 2016
$25.1M
Ophthalmic Therapeutics Engineering CoreP30EY029220 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Mahnaz Shahidi · 2018 to 2026
$6.5M
NEI UCI Center Core Grant for Vision ResearchP30EY034070 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Vladimir Jivkov Kefalov · 2022 to 2026
$3.7M
Integration and functionality of retinal organoid transplantsR01EY031834 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI SEILER, MAGDALENE J · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
Retinal sheet transplant impact on functional organization of visual cortex in retinal degenerate animal modelsR01EY032948 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LYON, DAVID C, SEILER, MAGDALENE J · 2022 to 2025
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA062203NEI NIH HHS P30 EY029220NEI NIH HHS P30 EY034070NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031834NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032948NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM076516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal degeneration (RD) diseases leading to severe vision loss can affect photoreceptors (PRs) that are responsible for phototransduction, or retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) providing support for PRs. Human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)-based therapies are a potential approach for restoration of retinal structure in patients with currently incurable RD diseases. Currently, there are two targeted hPSC therapeutics: PR rescue and PR replacement. PR rescue involves the transplantation of RPE or other neural progenitors into the subretinal space to slow down or prevent further RD. RPE transplantation plays a critical role in preserving photoreceptors by providing trophic support and maintaining retinal integrity, particularly in diseases like age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Advances in RPE transplantation methods, such as polarized monolayer cultures and scaffold-based approaches, have shown promise in enhancing graft survival and integration. However, limitations include inconsistent integration, variable neurotrophic factor secretion, and immune rejection risks in non-autologous transplants. In PR replacement, stem cell-derived photoreceptor-like cells or photoreceptor progenitors (PRP) obtained are transplanted into the eye. While PRPs are commonly obtained from retinal organoids (ROs), alternative sources, such as early differentiation stages or direct differentiation protocols, are also utilized to enhance the efficiency and scalability of PRP generation. Challenges include achieving proper integration, forming outer segments, rosette formation, and avoiding immune rejection or tumorigenicity. Various animal models that simulate human RD diseases are being used for establishing surgical feasibility, graft survival and visual functional recovery but fail to replicate clinical immune challenges. Rodent models lack macula-like structures and have limited reliability in detecting subtle functional changes, while larger animal models pose ethical, logistical, and financial challenges. Immunocompromised models have been developed for minimizing xenograft issues. Visual functional testing for efficacy includes optokinetic testing (OKN), electroretinography (ERG), and electrophysiological recordings from the retina and brain. These tests often fail to capture the complexity of human visual recovery, highlighting the need for advanced models and improved functional testing techniques. This review aims to aggregate current knowledge about approaches to stem cell transplantation, requirements of animal models chosen for validating vision benefits of transplantation studies, advantages of using specific disease models and their limitations. While promising strides have been made, addressing these limitations remains essential for translating stem cell-based therapies into clinical success.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalRetinal DegenerationRetinal Pigment EpitheliumStem Cell TransplantationAnimalsHumansPhotoreceptor Cells, VertebratePluripotent stem cellsRetinal degenerationRetinal disease modelsRetinal organoidsVision testing

Identifiers

PMID40239758
PMCPMC12145155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.