ReviewProgress in retinal and eye research2025
Animal models for the evaluation of retinal stem cell therapies.
Review in Progress in retinal and eye research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generation of a New Immunodeficient Rat Model of Retinal Degeneration With LSL TdTomato Reporter and TdTomato-Pcp2 Expression.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Redefining ocular safety assessment: retinal organoids as platforms for predicting human ocular toxicology.Genes & genomics · 2026Review
- A comparative survey of functional evidence use in hearing and vision loss genetics.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Organoids: generation strategies, applications, and future challenges.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- Adaptive drift-aware multi-stage deep learning framework for EEG-based schizophrenia diagnosis.BioData mining · 2026Article
- Generation of a new immunodeficient rat model of retinal degeneration with LSL TdTomato reporter and TdTomato-Pcp2 expression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Retinal degeneration (RD) diseases leading to severe vision loss can affect photoreceptors (PRs) that are responsible for phototransduction, or retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) providing support for PRs. Human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)-based therapies are a potential approach for restoration of retinal structure in patients with currently incurable RD diseases. Currently, there are two targeted hPSC therapeutics: PR rescue and PR replacement. PR rescue involves the transplantation of RPE or other neural progenitors into the subretinal space to slow down or prevent further RD. RPE transplantation plays a critical role in preserving photoreceptors by providing trophic support and maintaining retinal integrity, particularly in diseases like age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Advances in RPE transplantation methods, such as polarized monolayer cultures and scaffold-based approaches, have shown promise in enhancing graft survival and integration. However, limitations include inconsistent integration, variable neurotrophic factor secretion, and immune rejection risks in non-autologous transplants. In PR replacement, stem cell-derived photoreceptor-like cells or photoreceptor progenitors (PRP) obtained are transplanted into the eye. While PRPs are commonly obtained from retinal organoids (ROs), alternative sources, such as early differentiation stages or direct differentiation protocols, are also utilized to enhance the efficiency and scalability of PRP generation. Challenges include achieving proper integration, forming outer segments, rosette formation, and avoiding immune rejection or tumorigenicity. Various animal models that simulate human RD diseases are being used for establishing surgical feasibility, graft survival and visual functional recovery but fail to replicate clinical immune challenges. Rodent models lack macula-like structures and have limited reliability in detecting subtle functional changes, while larger animal models pose ethical, logistical, and financial challenges. Immunocompromised models have been developed for minimizing xenograft issues. Visual functional testing for efficacy includes optokinetic testing (OKN), electroretinography (ERG), and electrophysiological recordings from the retina and brain. These tests often fail to capture the complexity of human visual recovery, highlighting the need for advanced models and improved functional testing techniques. This review aims to aggregate current knowledge about approaches to stem cell transplantation, requirements of animal models chosen for validating vision benefits of transplantation studies, advantages of using specific disease models and their limitations. While promising strides have been made, addressing these limitations remains essential for translating stem cell-based therapies into clinical success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.