ArticleKlinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde2025
Evaluating Photodynamic Therapy vs. Subthreshold Micropulse Laser for Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOur study aims to compare the efficacy of half-dose photodynamic therapy with verteporfin (PDT) and subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) with regards to subretinal fluid (SRF) resorption, visual acuity (VA), and central subfield thickness (CST). PATIENTS AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective multicentre clinical study at the Departments of Ophthalmology at the University Hospital Zurich and Stadtspital Zürich, Switzerland. The study included patients with acute and chronic CSCR who underwent PDT, SML, or both sequentially between June 1, 2020 and December 31, 2023. The primary outcome was the reduction in SRF at three and six months post-treatment. The secondary outcomes included change in CST VA at the same intervals.
resultsA total of eighty-one eyes were analysed (33 PDT, 35 SML, thirteen combined). SRF reduction was statistically significant at both three and six months in the PDT (p < 0.001) and SML groups (p < 0.001). The combined treatment group showed a significant reduction in SRF only at six months (p = 0.001). At three months, PDT resulted in a significantly greater SRF reduction than the combined group.
conclusionsBoth PDT and SML demonstrated improvements in SRF, CST and VA, with SML presenting as a comparable alternative, particularly in cases where access to verteporfin is limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.