ArticleCurrent biology : CB2025
Developmental onset of planarian whole-body regeneration depends on axis reset.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic cell fate transitions during morphallactic regeneration.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Retention and Distribution of Dopamine-Dependent Reward Memory in Regenerating Planaria.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Regrowing the growth zone: metamorphosis kickstarts regeneration in the annelid Capitella teleta.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
- Planarian microtubules form a network within muscle and regulate injury-induced genes essential for regeneration patterning.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Regenerative abilities vary across species and developmental stages of animal life cycles. Determining mechanisms that promote or limit regeneration in certain life cycle stages may pinpoint the most critical factors for successful regeneration and suggest strategies for reverse-engineering regenerative responses in therapeutic settings. In contrast to many mammalian systems, which typically show a loss of regenerative abilities with age, planarian flatworms remain highly regenerative throughout adulthood. The robust reproductive and regenerative capabilities of the planarian Schmidtea polychroa (S. polychroa) make them an ideal model to determine when and how regeneration competence is established during development. We report that S. polychroa gradually acquires whole-body regenerative abilities during late embryonic and early juvenile stages. Anterior fragments are capable of regenerating missing trunk and tail tissues from stage 6.5 onward. By contrast, the ability of posterior fragments to make new head tissue depends on the developmental stage, tissue composition of the amputated fragment, and axial position of the cut plane. Irradiation-sensitive cells are required, but not sufficient, for the onset of head regeneration ability. We propose that regulation of the main body axis reset, specifically the ability to remake an anterior organizing center, determines when whole-body regeneration competence arises during development. Supporting this hypothesis, knockdown of the canonical Wnt pathway effector Spol-β-catenin-1, a posterior determinant, induces precocious head regeneration under conditions that are normally head regeneration-incompetent. Our results suggest that regeneration competence emerges through interactions between irradiation-sensitive cells, the cellular source of new tissue, and developing adult tissue(s) harboring axial patterning information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.