ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2025
Interoceptive processing in the nucleus of the solitary tract.
Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain-Wide Connectivity and Topographic Organization of Leptin Receptor Neurons in the Dorsomedial Hypothalamus.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Brain-Wide Mapping and Synaptic Localization of C1QL3 Using a Novel Epitope-Tagged Knock-In Mouse.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2026Article
- Molecular architecture of excitatory and inhibitory neurons in the first gustatory relay.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Prefrontal dysregulation of interoceptive and emotional processing in episodic migraine: a task-based fMRI study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Cellular coding of ingestion in the caudal brainstem.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Operationalizing the Mind-Body Connection: Interoception via the Autonomic Nervous System.NeuroSci · 2026Article
- Altered eating experience during GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy: a sensory-liking-wanting framework for food preference and nutritional behaviour.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- A structured narrative review on VNS-treated drug-resistant epilepsy: EEG markers, neurochemical mechanisms, and future biomarker-driven computational directions.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Individual paraventricular hypothalamic GLP-1R neurons track ingestion across energy states.iScience · 2025Article
- Arousal increases locus coeruleus blood flow, salience-related brain responses, and modulates negative-valence attentional biases.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Airway sensory systems: breathing new life into microbiota-brain communication.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The interoceptive nervous system continuously monitors the status of visceral organs to synthesize internal perceptions and regulate behavioral and physiological responses. The nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) in the brainstem serves as a central interoceptive hub and the initial site where sensory information from internal organs is processed in the brain. Here we review the neurobiological underpinnings of interoceptive processing in the NTS, focusing on recent progress enabled by modern genetic and optical tools for neural circuit dissection and neuronal recordings. Sensory information from internal organs is organized into a topographic map within the NTS, computed locally, modulated by descending inputs from higher brain regions, and distributed to downstream targets via projection neurons to control behavior and physiology. We present a sensory processing perspective on interoceptive coding within this brain structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.