ArticleTechnology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine2025
Machine learning for improved medical device management: A focus on dialysis machines.
Article in Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Expression of concern
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundDialysis is a very complex treatment that is received by around 3 million people annually. Around 10% of the death cases in the presence of the dialysis machine were due to the technical errors of dialysis devices. One of the ways to maintain dialysis devices is by using machine learning and predictive maintenance in order to reduce the risk of patient's death, costs of repairs and provide a higher quality treatment.ObjectivePrediction of dialysis machine performance status and errors using regression models.MethodThe methodology includes seven steps: data collection, processing, model selection, training, evaluation, fine-tuning, and prediction. After preprocessing 1034 measurements, twelve machine learning models were trained to predict dialysis machine performance, and temperature and conductivity error values.ResultsEach model was trained 100 times on different splits of the dataset (80% training, 10% testing, 10% evaluation). Logistic regression achieved the highest accuracy in predicting dialysis machine performance. For temperature predictions, Lasso regression had the lowest MSE on training data (0.0058), while Linear regression showed the highest R² (0.59). For conductivity predictions, Lasso regression provided the lowest MSE (0.134), with Decision tree achieving the highest R² (0.2036). SVM attained the lowest MSE on testing dataset, with 0.0055 for temperature and 0.1369 for conductivity.ConclusionThe results of this study demonstrate that clinical engineering (CE) and health technology management (HTM) departments in healthcare institutions can benefit from proposed automated systems for advanced management of dialysis machines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40239129What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.