Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40239015›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology2025

Development of a Polidocanol-based Human

Ashesh Chakraborty, Marie Zöller, Aydan Sardogan, Markus Klotz, Michal Mastalerz, Hannah Marchi, Raphael Meixner, Rudolf A Hatz, Jürgen Behr, Anne Hilgendorff and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Closing the Gap: Use of Polidocanol to Study Human Airway Epithelial Repair.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ashesh ChakrabortyMember of the German Center for Lung Research, Institute of Lung Health and Immunity, and Comprehensive Pneumology Center with the CPC-M bioArchive, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München and Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.
Marie ZöllerMember of the German Center for Lung Research, Institute of Lung Health and Immunity, and Comprehensive Pneumology Center with the CPC-M bioArchive, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München and Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.
Aydan SardoganInstitute of Regenerative Biology and Medicine, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany.
Markus KlotzMember of the German Center for Lung Research, Institute of Lung Health and Immunity, and Comprehensive Pneumology Center with the CPC-M bioArchive, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München and Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.
Michal MastalerzMember of the German Center for Lung Research, Institute of Lung Health and Immunity, and Comprehensive Pneumology Center with the CPC-M bioArchive, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München and Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.
Hannah MarchiCore Facility Statistical Consulting, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.
Raphael MeixnerCore Facility Statistical Consulting, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.
Rudolf A HatzThoraxchirurgisches Zentrum, Klinik für Allgemeine-, Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Gefäß- und Thoraxchirurgie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Jürgen BehrDepartment of Medicine V, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität University Hospital, Comprehensive Pneumology Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, German Center for Lung Research, Munich, Germany; and.
Anne HilgendorffMember of the German Center for Lung Research, Institute of Lung Health and Immunity, and Comprehensive Pneumology Center with the CPC-M bioArchive, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München and Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.
Misako NakayamaMember of the German Center for Lung Research, Institute of Lung Health and Immunity, and Comprehensive Pneumology Center with the CPC-M bioArchive, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München and Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.
Claudia A Staab-WeijnitzMember of the German Center for Lung Research, Institute of Lung Health and Immunity, and Comprehensive Pneumology Center with the CPC-M bioArchive, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München and Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1211-7834

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GRK2338Helmholtz Association
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human airway epithelium is a primary site of toxicant exposure and crucial in the pathogenesis of acute and chronic lung disease. In chronic lung disease (CLD), the airway epithelium is frequently altered and distorted, and its restoration is desirable. The mechanisms underlying human aberrant epithelial regeneration, however, are poorly understood. Importantly, our knowledge about airway epithelial injury and regeneration stems largely from mouse models; yet, airways differ considerably between mice and humans. We hypothesized that treatment of differentiated primary human bronchial epithelial cells (phBECs) with polidocanol (PDOC) or naphthalene would allow study of mechanisms of human airway epithelial injury and regeneration. Injury of differentiated phBECs with 0.04% but not 0.1% PDOC resulted in full restoration of a functional epithelium and epithelial barrier integrity as monitored by qRT-PCR analysis, immunofluorescence staining, and transepithelial electrical resistance measurements. Regeneration was associated with a transient but not parallel increase of p21

Indexed as

BronchiEpithelial CellsPolidocanolRegenerationRespiratory MucosaAnimalsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedHumansMiceNaphthalenesnaphthaleneNaphthalenesPolidocanolairway injuryairway regenerationbronchial epitheliumhuman bronchial epithelial cellspolidocanol

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.