ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2025
Intronic FGF14 GAA repeat expansions impact progression and survival in multiple system atrophy.
Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical, Genetic, and Imaging Characteristics of SCA27B: Insights from a Large Dutch Cohort.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026Article
- Review
- Genetic testing for SCA27B in Korean multiple system atrophy.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Article
- GAA-FGF14 Expansions and CACNA1A Variants: Phenotypic Overlap and Diagnostic Implications.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
53 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Partial phenotypic overlap has been suggested between multiple system atrophy and spinocerebellar ataxia 27B, the autosomal dominant ataxia caused by an intronic GAA•TTC repeat expansion in FGF14. In this study, we investigated the frequency of FGF14 GAA•TTC repeat expansion in clinically diagnosed and pathologically confirmed multiple system atrophy cases. We screened 657 multiple system atrophy cases (193 clinically diagnosed and 464 pathologically confirmed) and 1003 controls. The FGF14 repeat locus was genotyped using long-range PCR and bidirectional repeat-primed PCRs, and expansions were confirmed with targeted long-read Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing. We identified 19 multiple system atrophy cases carrying an FGF14 GAA≥250 expansion (2.89%, n = 19/657), a significantly higher frequency than in controls (1.40%, n = 12/1003) (P = 0.04). Long-read Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing confirmed repeat sizes and polymorphisms detected by PCR, with high concordance (Pearson's r = 0.99, P < 0.0001). Seven multiple system atrophy patients had a pathogenic FGF14 GAA≥300 expansion (five pathologically confirmed and two clinically diagnosed), and 12 had intermediate GAA250-299 expansion (six pathologically confirmed and six clinically diagnosed). A similar proportion of cerebellar-predominant and parkinsonism-predominant multiple system atrophy cases had FGF14 expansions. Multiple system atrophy patients carrying an FGF14 GAA≥250 expansion exhibited severe gait ataxia, autonomic dysfunction and parkinsonism, in keeping with a multiple system atrophy phenotype, with a faster progression to falls (P = 0.03) and regular wheelchair use (P = 0.02) in comparison to the multiple system atrophy cases without FGF14 GAA expansion. The length of the GAA•TTC repeat expansion lengths was inversely correlated with survival in multiple system atrophy patients (r = -0.67; P = 0.02) but not with age of onset. Therefore, screening for FGF14 GAA•TTC repeat expansion should be considered for multiple system atrophy patients with rapid loss of mobility and for complete diagnostic accuracy at inclusion in disease-modifying multiple system atrophy drug trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.