ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026
Obstacles and Aspirations for Improving Delivery of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation to Wheelchair Users: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo describe obstacles and ideas for improvement for the delivery of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and basic life support to wheelchair users.
designA descriptive qualitative study underpinned by constructivism was conducted.
methodsSemi structured interviews were completed with 26 participants from three cohorts: formal and informal carers, wheelchair users and healthcare professionals. Data were collected via online and in person interviews between February and June 2024. All participants were located in Australia, with the exception of one who was located in the United Kingdom. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsTwo major themes were identified: (1) obstacles to providing cardiopulmonary resuscitation and basic life support to a wheelchair user and (2) aspirations for improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation and basic life support for wheelchair users.
conclusionParticipants shared ideas for how to improve emergency care for wheelchair users, highlighting a need for further research, testing and development of an education intervention. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Improving knowledge about providing emergency care to a wheelchair user could improve outcomes, save lives and reduce the life expectancy gap experienced by people with disability. IMPACT: Approximately 2% of the global population use a wheelchair. Wheelchair use complicates the delivery of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and basic life support. There are currently no guidelines informing emergency care for wheelchair users available globally. Recognition of common symptoms of distress exhibited by wheelchair users, and options for the delivery of practical emergency care are required for wheelchair users. REPORTING
methodThe paper adheres to the EQUATOR reporting guidelines utilising the SRQR checklist. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients and the public were the driving force in recognising the gap in knowledge regarding the delivery of CPR to wheelchair users. Questions from patients and the public shaped the aims and methodological choices for this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.