Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40238902›Full record

ArticleThe Milbank quarterly2025

Scaling an Evidence-Based Community Health Worker Program With Fidelity: Results and Lessons Learned.

Molly Knowles, Aditi Vasan, Ziwei Pan, Judith A Long, Shreya Kangovi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Milbank quarterly, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Molly KnowlesDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-6521-5326
Aditi VasanDivision of General Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Ziwei PanLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
Judith A LongDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Shreya KangoviDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute DI-2018C2-13000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Policy Points Effectively implemented community health worker (CHW) programs improve patient health outcomes and quality of care, reduce health care costs, and are a key strategy for addressing social and structural drivers of health. As policymakers consider funding mechanisms for CHW programs, it is crucial to tie funding to evidence-based best practices while also allowing for innovation and context-specific adaptations. CONTEXT: Community health worker (CHW) programs represent a key strategy for addressing social and structural drivers of health and have the potential to improve patient health outcomes and enhance quality of care while reducing health care costs. However, challenges such as high staff turnover, lack of program infrastructure, and inadequate CHW support and supervision can hinder implementation and sustainment of effective CHW programs. Furthermore, few CHW programs have been successfully scaled across multiple organizations and communities. Individualized Management for Person-Centered Targets (IMPaCT) is an evidence-based CHW model designed to address these challenges by standardizing processes for CHW hiring, training, support, and supervision while still allowing for context-specific adaptation and tailoring. In this dissemination and implementation project, we evaluated implementation of IMPaCT across five geographically and structurally distinct sites serving diverse and varied patient populations.

methodsModel fidelity was assessed across seven best practice domains via structured virtual observations with CHWs, supervisors, and program directors at each implementation site. Acute care use was evaluated using difference-in-differences regression modeling for patients enrolled in IMPaCT compared with a propensity score-matched control group. All implementation sites examined total hospital days per patient, and several sites chose to incorporate additional measures of acute care use such as the number of hospitalizations and emergency department visits.

findingsWe found that core program components were implemented consistently across sites, and three of five sites were able to both sustain implementation over a three-year period and demonstrate significant reductions in acute care use, consistent with previous randomized controlled trials of this program.

conclusionsHealth systems may be able to address social drivers of health and improve population health for patients who are low-income and patients of color by implementing evidence-based CHW programs with fidelity.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersEvidence-Based PracticeAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgram Evaluationcommunity health workersimplementation sciencesocial drivers of health

Identifiers

PMID40238902
PMCPMC12185375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.